Cited by 199Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and HealthCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Fixed Low-Dose Triple Combination Antihypertensive Medication vs Usual Care for Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension in Sri Lanka: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Webster, Ruth, Salam, Abdul, de Silva, H. Asita, Selak, Vanessa, Stepien, Sandrine, Rajapakse, Senaka, Amarasekara, Stanley, Amarasena, Naomali +21 more·2018·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Poorly controlled hypertension is a leading global public health problem requiring new treatment strategies. Objective: To assess whether a low-dose triple combination antihypertensive medication would achieve better blood pressure (BP) control vs usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, open-label trial of a low-dose triple BP therapy vs usual care for adults with hypertension (systolic BP >140 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP >90 mm Hg; or in patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease: >130 mm Hg and/or >80 mm Hg) requiring initiation (untreated patients) or escalation (patients receiving monotherapy) of antihypertensive therapy. Patients were enrolled from 11 urban hospital clinics in Sri Lanka from February 2016 to May 2017; follow-up ended in October 2017. Interventions: A once-daily fixed-dose triple combination pill (20 mg of telmisartan, 2.5 mg of amlodipine, and 12.5 mg of chlorthalidone) therapy (n = 349) or usual care (n = 351). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion achieving target systolic/diastolic BP (<140/90 mm Hg or <130/80 mm Hg in patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included mean systolic/diastolic BP difference during follow-up and withdrawal of BP medications due to an adverse event. Results: Among 700 randomized patients (mean age, 56 years; 58% women; 29% had diabetes; mean baseline systolic/diastolic BP, 154/90 mm Hg), 675 (96%) completed the trial. The triple combination pill increased the proportion achieving target BP vs usual care at 6 months (70% vs 55%, respectively; risk difference, 12.7% [95% CI, 3.2% to 22.0%]; P < .001). Mean systolic/diastolic BP at 6 months was 125/76 mm Hg for the triple combination pill vs 134/81 mm Hg for usual care (adjusted difference in postrandomization BP over the entire follow-up: systolic BP, -9.8 [95% CI, -7.9 to -11.6] mm Hg; diastolic BP, -5.0 [95% CI, -3.9 to -6.1] mm Hg; P < .001 for both comparisons). Overall, 419 adverse events were reported in 255 patients (38.1% for triple combination pill vs 34.8% for usual care) with the most common being musculoskeletal pain (6.0% and 8.0%, respectively) and dizziness, presyncope, or syncope (5.2% and 2.8%). There were no significant between-group differences in the proportion of patient withdrawal from BP-lowering therapy due to adverse events (6.6% for triple combination pill vs 6.8% for usual care). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with mild to moderate hypertension, treatment with a pill containing low doses of 3 antihypertensive drugs led to an increased proportion of patients achieving their target BP goal vs usual care. Use of such medication as initial therapy or to replace monotherapy may be an effective way to improve BP control. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12612001120864; slctr.lk Identifier: SLCTR/2015/020.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2018.10359

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For individuals with blood pressure $150/90 mmHg, initial pharmacologic treatment with two antihypertensive medications is recommended to more effectively achieve blood pressure goals.

    “For individuals with blood pressure $150/90 mmHg, initial pharmacologic treatment with two antihypertensive medications is recommended to more effectively achieve blood pressure goals (63-65).”

    From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Discussion reports that starting with two-drug therapy improved blood-pressure control compared with monotherapy in previous trials. It does not recommend two drugs specifically for people with blood pressure of 150/90 mm Hg; this trial tested an initial three-drug pill against usual care. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 199

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Turnbull F; Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events. Lancet. 2003;362(9395): 1527-1535. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14739-3 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Mills KT, Bundy JD, Kelly TN, et al. Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control. Circulation. 2016;134(6):441-450.
  3. Law MR, Wald NJ, Morris JK, Jordan RE. Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs. BMJ. 2003;326(7404): 1427-1431. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1427 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Leung AA, Nerenberg K, Daskalopoulou SS, et al. Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian hypertension education program guidelines for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(5):569-588.
  5. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/ NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults [published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(19):2275-2279]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(19):e127-e248.
  6. Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ. Randomized polypill crossover trial in people aged 50 and over. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41297.
  7. Gupta AK, Arshad S, Poulter NR. Compliance, safety, and effectiveness of fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensive agents. Hypertension. 2010;55(2):399-407.
  8. Webster R, Patel A, Selak V, et al. Effectiveness of fixed dose combination medication ('polypills') compared with usual care in patients with cardiovascular disease or at high risk. Int J Cardiol. 2016;205:147-156. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.12.015 · DOI
  9. Kizilirmak P, Berktas M, Uresin Y, Yildiz OB. The efficacy and safety of triple vs dual combination of angiotensin II receptor blocker and calcium channel blocker and diuretic. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013;15(3):193-200.
  10. Ford I, Norrie J. Pragmatic trials. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(5):454-463. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1510059 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Salam A, Webster R, Singh K, et al. TRIple pill vs Usual care Management for Patients with mild-to-moderate Hypertension (TRIUMPH). Am Heart J. 2014;167(2):127-132.
  12. Webster R. Protocol changes to the TRIUMPH study. Am Heart J. 2017;191:e1.
  13. EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199-208.
  14. Bennett A, Chow CK, Chou M, et al. Efficacy and safety of quarter-dose blood pressure-lowering agents. Hypertension. 2017;70(1):85-93.
  15. Feldman RD, Zou GY, Vandervoort MK, et al. A simplified approach to the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension. Hypertension. 2009; 53(4):646-653.
  16. Calhoun DA, Lacourcière Y, Chiang YT, Glazer RD. Triple antihypertensive therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide. Hypertension. 2009;54(1):32-39.
  17. Abdi H. Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure. In: Encyclopedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2010:1-8.
  18. Wald DS, Law M, Morris JK, Bestwick JP, Wald NJ. Combination therapy versus monotherapy in reducing blood pressure. Am J Med. 2009;122(3): 290-300. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.038 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Mahmud A, Feely J. Low-dose quadruple antihypertensive combination. Hypertension. 2007; 49(2):272-275.
  20. MacDonald TM, Williams B, Webb DJ, et al. Combination therapy is superior to sequential monotherapy for the initial treatment of hypertension. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(11):6.
  21. Mourad JJ, Waeber B, Zannad F, et al. Comparison of different therapeutic strategies in hypertension. J Hypertens. 2004;22(12):2379-2386.
  22. Wang YR, Alexander GC, Stafford RS. Outpatient hypertension treatment, treatment intensification, and control in Western Europe and the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(2): 141-147. doi:10.1001/archinte.167.2.141 · DOI
  23. Ferrari P; National Coordinators for the Reasons for not Intensifying Antihypertensive Treatment (RIAT) trial12. Reasons for therapeutic inertia when managing hypertension in clinical practice in non-Western countries. J Hum Hypertens. 2009;23(3):151-159. doi:10.1038/jhh.2008.117 · DOI
  24. Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN, et al. Uncontrolled and apparent treatment resistant hypertension in the United States, 1988 to 2008. Circulation. 2011; 124(9):1046-1058.
  25. Redón J, Coca A, Lázaro P, et al. Factors associated with therapeutic inertia in hypertension. J Hypertens. 2010;28(8):1770-1777.
  26. Katulanda P, Ranasinghe P, Jayawardena R, et al. The prevalence, predictors and associations of hypertension in Sri Lanka. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2014;36(7):484-491.
  27. Volpe M, Gallo G, Tocci G. Is early and fast blood pressure control important in hypertension management? Int J Cardiol. 2018;254:328-332.
  28. Goldman AI, Steele BW, Schnaper HW, et al. Serum lipoprotein levels during chlorthalidone therapy. JAMA. 1980;244(15):1691-1695.
  29. Olde Engberink RH, Frenkel WJ, van den Bogaard B, et al. Effects of thiazide-type and thiazide-like diuretics on cardiovascular events and mortality. Hypertension. 2015;65(5):1033-1040.
  30. Beddhu S, Rocco MV, Toto R, et al. Effects of intensive systolic blood pressure control on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in persons without kidney disease. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(6):375-383.
  31. Attaei MW, Khatib R, McKee M, et al. Availability and affordability of blood pressure-lowering medicines and the effect on blood pressure control in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(9):e411-e419.
  32. Muntner P, Carey RM, Gidding S, et al. Potential US population impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA high blood pressure guideline. Circulation. 2018;137(2): 109-118.
  33. Jaffe MG, Lee GA, Young JD, Sidney S, Go AS. Improved blood pressure control associated with a large-scale hypertension program. JAMA. 2013; 310(7):699-705. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.108769 · DOI

Authors
Webster, R., Salam, A., de Silva, H. A., Selak, V., Stepien, S., Rajapakse, S., Amarasekara, S., Amarasena, N., Billot, L., de Silva, A. P., Fernando, M., Guggilla, R., Jan, S., Jayawardena, J., Maulik, P. K., Mendis, S., Mendis, S., Munasinghe, J., Naik, N., Prabhakaran, D., Ranasinghe, G., Thom, S., Tisserra, N., Senaratne, V., Wijekoon, S., Wijeyasingam, S., Rodgers, A., Patel, A., & for the TRIUMPH Study Group
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of Colombo (LK)
  • National Hospital of Sri Lanka (LK)
  • Sri Jayawardenapura General Hospital, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
  • Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka
  • Ministry of Health (SA)
  • Colombo North Teaching Hospital (LK)
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Centre for Chronic Disease Control (IN)
  • National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Sri Jayewardenepura (LK)
Corresponding author
Webster, Ruth
Venue
JAMA
Published
2018-08-14
Volume
320
Issue
6
Pages
566
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2887966018
Cited by
199
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 7
FWCI
14.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
low-dose antihypertensive therapy, blood pressure control, mild to moderate hypertension, telmisartan, amlodipine, chlorthalidone, usual care, antihypertensive medication withdrawal, adverse events, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, Sri Lanka
MeSH terms
Telmisartan, Adult, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Benzimidazoles, Benzoates, Blood Pressure, Chlorthalidone, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Potassium, Sri Lanka, Amlodipine, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review