Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Lanadelumab Compared With Placebo on Prevention of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Banerji, Aleena, Riedl, Marc A., Bernstein, Jonathan A., Cicardi, Marco, Longhurst, Hilary J., Zuraw, Bruce L., Busse, Paula J., Anderson, John, Magerl, Markus, Martinez-Saguer, Inmaculada, Davis-Lorton, Mark, Zanichelli, Andrea, Li, H. Henry, Craig, Timothy, Jacobs, Joshua, Johnston, Douglas T., Shapiro, Ralph, Yang, William H., Lumry, William R., Manning, Michael E., Schwartz, Lawrence B., Shennak, Mustafa, Soteres, Daniel, Zaragoza-Urdaz, Rafael H., Gierer, Selina, Smith, Andrew M., Tachdjian, Raffi, Wedner, H. James, Hebert, Jacques, Rehman, Syed M., Staubach, Petra, Schranz, Jennifer, Baptista, Jovanna, Nothaft, Wolfram, Maurer, Marcus, for the HELP Investigators·2018·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Current treatments for long-term prophylaxis in hereditary angioedema have limitations. Objective: To assess the efficacy of lanadelumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits active plasma kallikrein, in preventing hereditary angioedema attacks. Design, Setting, and Participants: Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 41 sites in Canada, Europe, Jordan, and the United States. Patients were randomized between March 3, 2016, and September 9, 2016; last day of follow-up was April 13, 2017. Randomization was 2:1 lanadelumab to placebo; patients assigned to lanadelumab were further randomized 1:1:1 to 1 of the 3 dose regimens. Patients 12 years or older with hereditary angioedema type I or II underwent a 4-week run-in period and those with 1 or more hereditary angioedema attacks during run-in were randomized. Interventions: Twenty-six-week treatment with subcutaneous lanadelumab 150 mg every 4 weeks (n = 28), 300 mg every 4 weeks (n = 29), 300 mg every 2 weeks (n = 27), or placebo (n = 41). All patients received injections every 2 weeks, with those in the every-4-week group receiving placebo in between active treatments. Main Outcome and Measures: Primary efficacy end point was the number of investigator-confirmed attacks of hereditary angioedema over the treatment period. Results: Among 125 patients randomized (mean age, 40.7 years [SD, 14.7 years]; 88 females [70.4%]; 113 white [90.4%]), 113 (90.4%) completed the study. During the run-in period, the mean number of hereditary angioedema attacks per month in the placebo group was 4.0; for the lanadelumab groups, 3.2 for the every-4-week 150-mg group; 3.7 for the every-4-week 300-mg group; and 3.5 for the every-2-week 300-mg group. During the treatment period, the mean number of attacks per month for the placebo group was 1.97; for the lanadelumab groups, 0.48 for the every-4-week 150-mg group; 0.53 for the every-4-week 300-mg group; and 0.26 for the every-2-week 300-mg group. Compared with placebo, the mean differences in the attack rate per month were -1.49 (95% CI, -1.90 to -1.08; P < .001); -1.44 (95% CI, -1.84 to -1.04; P < .001); and -1.71 (95% CI, -2.09 to -1.33; P < .001). The most commonly occurring adverse events with greater frequency in the lanadelumab treatment groups were injection site reactions (34.1% placebo, 52.4% lanadelumab) and dizziness (0% placebo, 6.0% lanadelumab). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with hereditary angioedema type I or II, treatment with subcutaneous lanadelumab for 26 weeks significantly reduced the attack rate compared with placebo. These findings support the use of lanadelumab as a prophylactic therapy for hereditary angioedema. Further research is needed to determine long-term safety and efficacy. Trial Registration: EudraCT Identifier: 2015-003943-20; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02586805.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2018.16773

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Banerji, A., Riedl, M. A., Bernstein, J. A., Cicardi, M., Longhurst, H. J., Zuraw, B. L., Busse, P. J., Anderson, J., Magerl, M., Martinez-Saguer, I., Davis-Lorton, M., Zanichelli, A., Li, H. H., Craig, T., Jacobs, J., Johnston, D. T., Shapiro, R., Yang, W. H., Lumry, W. R., Manning, M. E., Schwartz, L. B., Shennak, M., Soteres, D., Zaragoza-Urdaz, R. H., Gierer, S., Smith, A. M., Tachdjian, R., Wedner, H. J., Hebert, J., Rehman, S. M., Staubach, P., Schranz, J., Baptista, J., Nothaft, W., Maurer, M., & for the HELP Investigators
Venue
JAMA
Published
2018-11-27
Volume
320
Issue
20
Pages
2108
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2902818271
Cited by
312
References
12
FWCI
13.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Lanadelumab Compared With Placebo on Prevention of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks: A Randomized Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2018.16773
The paper
Banerji, A., Riedl, M. A., Bernstein, J. A., Cicardi, M., Longhurst, H. J., Zuraw, B. L., Busse, P. J., Anderson, J., Magerl, M., Martinez-Saguer, I., Davis-Lorton, M., Zanichelli, A., Li, H. H., Craig, T., Jacobs, J., Johnston, D. T., Shapiro, R., Yang, W. H., Lumry, W. R., . . . for the HELP Investigators. (2018). Effect of Lanadelumab Compared With Placebo on Prevention of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.16773

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.