The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and construct validation of the angioedema quality of life questionnaire
Abstract
Background: Recurrent angioedema is a frequent clinical problem characterized by unpredictably and rapidly occurring cutaneous and mucosal swellings. These swellings may be painful and/or disfiguring. Upper airway involvement can also lead to dyspnea and suffocation. Although the disease burden is high, there is currently no specific instrument to measure health‐related quality of life (QoL) impairment. Objective: To develop and validate the first symptom‐specific tool to assess QoL impairment in recurrent angioedema patients, adhering to established methodological recommendations. Methods: During the development phase, 29 questions (items) were generated. Subsequently, item reduction was performed by means of impact analysis and factor analysis as well as by checking for content and face validity. As a result, 17 items were selected and included in the final instrument, the Angioedema QoL Questionnaire (AE‐QoL). AE‐QoL was then tested for its validity, reliability, and influence factors. Results: One hundred and ten angioedema patients took part in the validation of AE‐QoL. AE‐QoL was found to have a four‐dimensional structure as well as a valid total score. All of its four domains (functioning, fatigue/mood, fears/shame, food) showed good levels of internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha > 0.8. Test–retesting revealed a good reliability of the instruments total score and domain scores. Gender as well as the patients' self‐rated disease activity was found to be predictors of the AE‐QoL total score. Conclusions: Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire is the first angioedema‐specific QoL questionnaire. It is a short, valid and reliable instrument that may serve as a valuable tool in future clinical studies and in routine patient care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286 · Cited by 3,970
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health (2006) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-79 · Cited by 2,856
How to assess disease activity in patients with chronic urticaria?
Młynek, A., Zalewska‐Janowska, A., Martus, P., Staubach, P., Zuberbier, T., & Maurer, M. (2008) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01726.x · Cited by 385
Self-citation
Cited by
The burden of chronic spontaneous urticaria is substantial: Real‐world evidence from ASSURE ‐ CSU
Maurer, M., Abuzakouk, M., Bérard, F., Canonica, W., Oude Elberink, H., Giménez‐Arnau, A., Grattan, C., Hollis, K., Knulst, A., Lacour, J. ‐., et al. (2017) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.13209 · Cited by 383
Self-citationBanerji, A., Riedl, M. A., Bernstein, J. A., Cicardi, M., Longhurst, H. J., Zuraw, B. L., Busse, P. J., Anderson, J., Magerl, M., Martinez-Saguer, I., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.16773 · Cited by 312
Self-citationMaurer, M., Staubach, P., Raap, U., Richter‐Huhn, G., Bauer, A., Ruëff, F., Jakob, T., Yazdi, A. S., Mahler, V., Wagner, N., et al. (2017) · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1111/cea.12900 · Cited by 131
Self-citationStaubach, P., Metz, M., Chapman‐Rothe, N., Sieder, C., Bräutigam, M., Canvin, J., & Maurer, M. (2016) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.12870 · Cited by 130
Self-citationAntihistamine‐resistant chronic spontaneous urticaria: 1‐year data from the AWARE study
Maurer, M., Raap, U., Staubach, P., Richter‐Huhn, G., Bauer, A., Oppel, E. M., Hillen, U., Baeumer, D., Reinhardt, M., & Chapman‐Rothe, N. (2019) · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1111/cea.13309 · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Weller, K., Groffik, A., Magerl, M., Tohme, N., Martus, P., Krause, K., Metz, M., Staubach, P., & Maurer, M.
- Venue
- Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-23
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1289-1298
- ISSN
- 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
- 1398-9995
- OpenAlex
- W2034631606
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and construct validation of the angioedema quality of life questionnaire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/all.12007
- The paper
- Weller, K., Groffik, A., Magerl, M., Tohme, N., Martus, P., Krause, K., Metz, M., Staubach, P., & Maurer, M. (2012). Development and construct validation of the angioedema quality of life questionnaire. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.