Cited by 325Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareHealthcare Policy and ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Association between loss of hospital-based obstetric services and birth outcomes in rural counties in the United States

Open access
Kozhimannil, Katy B., Hung, Peiyin, Henning-Smith, Carrie, Casey, Michelle M., Prasad, Shailendra·2018·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Hospital-based obstetric services have decreased in rural US counties, but whether this has been associated with changes in birth location and outcomes is unknown. Objective: To examine the relationship between loss of hospital-based obstetric services and location of childbirth and birth outcomes in rural counties. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study, using county-level regression models in an annual interrupted time series approach. Births occurring from 2004 to 2014 in rural US counties were identified using birth certificates linked to American Hospital Association Annual Surveys. Participants included 4 941 387 births in all 1086 rural counties with hospital-based obstetric services in 2004. Exposures: Loss of hospital-based obstetric services in the county of maternal residence, stratified by adjacency to urban areas. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were county rates of (1) out-of-hospital births; (2) births in hospitals without obstetric units; and (3) preterm births (<37 weeks' gestation). Results: Between 2004 and 2014, 179 rural counties lost hospital-based obstetric services. Of the 4 941 387 births studied, the mean (SD) maternal age was 26.2 (5.8) years. A mean (SD) of 75.9% (23.2%) of women who gave birth were non-Hispanic white, and 49.7% (15.6%) were college graduates. Rural counties not adjacent to urban areas that lost hospital-based obstetric services had significant increases in out-of-hospital births (0.70 percentage points [95% CI, 0.30 to 1.10]); births in a hospital without an obstetric unit (3.06 percentage points [95% CI, 2.66 to 3.46]); and preterm births (0.67 percentage points [95% CI, 0.02 to 1.33]), in the year after loss of services, compared with those with continual obstetric services. Rural counties adjacent to urban areas that lost hospital-based obstetric services also had significant increases in births in a hospital without obstetric services (1.80 percentage points [95% CI, 1.55 to 2.05]) in the year after loss of services, compared with those with continual obstetric services, and this was followed by a decreasing trend (-0.19 percentage points per year [95% CI, -0.25 to -0.14]). Conclusions and Relevance: In rural US counties not adjacent to urban areas, loss of hospital-based obstetric services, compared with counties with continual services, was associated with increases in out-of-hospital and preterm births and births in hospitals without obstetric units in the following year; the latter also occurred in urban-adjacent counties. These findings may inform planning and policy regarding rural obstetric services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2018.1830

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [23]23. Committee on Obstetric Practice American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Committee opinion No. 644: the Apgar score. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(4):e52-e55.
  2. [25]25. Armstrong RA. When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(5): 502-508.
  3. [33]33. Behrman R, Stith Butler A, eds; Institute of Medicine Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcones. Preterm Birth. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.

Authors
Kozhimannil, K. B., Hung, P., Henning-Smith, C., Casey, M. M., & Prasad, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis
Corresponding author
Kozhimannil, Katy B.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2018-03-27
Volume
319
Issue
12
Pages
1239
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2793794978
Cited by
325
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
44.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
rural counties, out-of-hospital birth, birthplace, preterm birth, birth outcomes, maternity ward, rural healthcare access, urban-rural differences, rural-urban migration, rural-urban return migration, rural-urban health disparities
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Home Childbirth, Hospitals, Rural, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Retrospective Studies, United States, Birthing Centers, Premature Birth, Interrupted Time Series Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review