Cited by 47Medical Malpractice and Liability IssuesMedical and Health Sciences ResearchTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Reported Cases of Medical Malpractice in Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine

Open access
Fogel, Alexander L., Kvedar, Joseph C.·2019·JAMA

Abstract

In response to physicians’ concerns about exposure to malpractice risk in direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine, this study reviews the LexisNexis legal case database for reported cases of medical malpractice related to DTC telemedicine services or their health care professionals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2019.0395

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 2019 study cited no reported cases of medical malpractice against direct-to-patient telemedicine.

    “Although a 2019 study [19] cited no reported cases of medical malpractice against direct-to-patient telemedicine, the fact that patients’ privacy could be compromised at various checkpoints of image capture, transmission, and storage remains concerning.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fogel, A. L., & Kvedar, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Fogel, Alexander L.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2019-04-02
Volume
321
Issue
13
Pages
1309
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2926105284
Cited by
47
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10
FWCI
14.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
medical malpractice, direct-to-consumer telemedicine, medical malpractice litigation, physician liability, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Humans, Malpractice, United States, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review