The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patient Blood Management: Recommendations From the 2018 Frankfurt Consensus Conference
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Blood transfusion is one of the most frequently used therapies worldwide and is associated with benefits, risks, and costs. OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of evidence-based recommendations for patient blood management (PBM) and for research. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The scientific committee developed 17 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome (PICO) questions for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in adult patients in 3 areas: preoperative anemia (3 questions), RBC transfusion thresholds (11 questions), and implementation of PBM programs (3 questions). These questions guided the literature search in 4 biomedical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Transfusion Evidence Library), searched from inception to January 2018. Meta-analyses were conducted with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology and the Evidence-to-Decision framework by 3 panels including clinical and scientific experts, nurses, patient representatives, and methodologists, to develop clinical recommendations during a consensus conference in Frankfurt/Main, Germany, in April 2018. FINDINGS: From 17 607 literature citations associated with the 17 PICO questions, 145 studies, including 63 randomized clinical trials with 23 143 patients and 82 observational studies with more than 4 million patients, were analyzed. For preoperative anemia, 4 clinical and 3 research recommendations were developed, including the strong recommendation to detect and manage anemia sufficiently early before major elective surgery. For RBC transfusion thresholds, 4 clinical and 6 research recommendations were developed, including 2 strong clinical recommendations for critically ill but clinically stable intensive care patients with or without septic shock (recommended threshold for RBC transfusion, hemoglobin concentration <7 g/dL) as well as for patients undergoing cardiac surgery (recommended threshold for RBC transfusion, hemoglobin concentration <7.5 g/dL). For implementation of PBM programs, 2 clinical and 3 research recommendations were developed, including recommendations to implement comprehensive PBM programs and to use electronic decision support systems (both conditional recommendations) to improve appropriate RBC utilization. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The 2018 PBM International Consensus Conference defined the current status of the PBM evidence base for practice and research purposes and established 10 clinical recommendations and 12 research recommendations for preoperative anemia, RBC transfusion thresholds for adults, and implementation of PBM programs. The relative paucity of strong evidence to answer many of the PICO questions supports the need for additional research and an international consensus for accepted definitions and hemoglobin thresholds, as well as clinically meaningful end points for multicenter trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Akl, E. A., Kunz, R., Vist, G., Brozek, J., Norris, S., Falck-Ytter, Y., Glasziou, P., & deBeer, H. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 · Cited by 10,681
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care
Hébert, P. C., Wells, G., Blajchman, M. A., Marshall, J., Martin, C., Pagliarello, G., Tweeddale, M., Schweitzer, I., & Yetisir, E. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199902113400601 · Cited by 5,187
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care
(1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199904013401322 · Cited by 2,037
Transfusion Strategies for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Villanueva, C., Colomo, A., Bosch, A., Concepción, M., Hernandez-Gea, V., Aracil, C., Graupera, I., Poca, M., Alvarez-Urturi, C., Gordillo, J., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1211801 · Cited by 1,735
Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion in High-Risk Patients after Hip Surgery
Carson, J. L., Terrin, M. L., Noveck, H., Sanders, D. W., Chaitman, B. R., Rhoads, G. G., Nemo, G., Dragert, K., Beaupre, L., Hildebrand, K., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1012452 · Cited by 1,328
Self-citationPreoperative anaemia and postoperative outcomes in non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study
Musallam, K. M., Tamim, H. M., Richards, T., Spahn, D. R., Rosendaal, F. R., Habbal, A., Khreiss, M., Dahdaleh, F. S., Khavandi, K., Sfeir, P. M., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61381-0 · Cited by 1,260
Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion
Carson, J. L., Stanworth, S. J., Roubinian, N., Fergusson, D. A., Triulzi, D., Doree, C., & Hebert, P. C. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002042.pub4 · Cited by 1,250
Self-citationClinical Practice Guidelines From the AABB: Red Blood Cell Transfusion Thresholds and Storage
Carson, J. L., Guyatt, G., Heddle, N. M., Grossman, B. J., Cohn, C. S., Fung, M. K., Gernsheimer, T., Holcomb, J. B., Kaplan, L. J., Katz, L. M., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.9185 · Cited by 1,113
Self-citationTransfusion Requirements After Cardiac Surgery: The TRACS Randomized Controlled Trial
Hajjar, L. A., Vincent, J.-L., Galas, F. R. B. G., Nakamura, R. E., Silva, C. M. P., Santos, M. H., Fukushima, J., Filho, R. K., Sierra, D. B., Lopes, N. H., et al. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1446 · Cited by 1,054
Cited by
Pasricha, S.-R., Tye-Din, J., Muckenthaler, M. U., & Swinkels, D. W. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32594-0 · Cited by 1,069
Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion
Carson, J. L., Stanworth, S. J., Dennis, J. A., Trivella, M., Roubinian, N., Fergusson, D. A., Triulzi, D., Dorée, C., & Hébert, P. C. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002042.pub5 · Cited by 322
Self-citationRestrictive or Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Myocardial Infarction and Anemia
Carson, J. L., Brooks, M. M., Hébert, P. C., Goodman, S. G., Bertolet, M., Glynn, S. A., Chaitman, B. R., Simon, T., Lopes, R. D., Goldsweig, A. M., et al. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2307983 · Cited by 270
Self-citationRössler, J., Schoenrath, F., Seifert, B., Kaserer, A., Spahn, G. H., Falk, V., & Spahn, D. R. (2020) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2019.09.016 · Cited by 132
Hirano, Y., Miyoshi, Y., Kondo, Y., Okamoto, K., & Tanaka, H. (2019) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-019-2543-1 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, M. M., Van Remoortel, H., Meybohm, P., Aranko, K., Aubron, C., Burger, R., Carson, J. L., Cichutek, K., De Buck, E., Devine, D., Fergusson, D., Folléa, G., French, C., Frey, K. P., Gammon, R., Levy, J. H., Murphy, M. F., Ozier, Y., Pavenski, K., So-Osman, C., Tiberghien, P., Volmink, J., Waters, J. H., Wood, E. M., Seifried, E., & for the ICC PBM Frankfurt 2018 Group
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-03-12
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 983
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2921053578
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 97
- FWCI
- 38.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient Blood Management: Recommendations From the 2018 Frankfurt Consensus Conference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2019.0554
- The paper
- Mueller, M. M., Van Remoortel, H., Meybohm, P., Aranko, K., Aubron, C., Burger, R., Carson, J. L., Cichutek, K., De Buck, E., Devine, D., Fergusson, D., Folléa, G., French, C., Frey, K. P., Gammon, R., Levy, J. H., Murphy, M. F., Ozier, Y., Pavenski, K., . . . for the ICC PBM Frankfurt 2018 Group. (2019). Patient Blood Management: Recommendations From the 2018 Frankfurt Consensus Conference. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.0554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.