Cited by 55Probiotics and Fermented FoodsComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

The Probiotic Conundrum: Regulatory Confusion, Conflicting Studies, and Safety Concerns

Freedman, Stephen B., Schnadower, David, Tarr, Phillip I.·2020·JAMA

Abstract

This Viewpoint characterizes reasons for the lack of evidence about the health effects of probiotic supplements and cautions against a “can’t hurt, can’t help” presumption made by consumers and clinicians.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2019.22268

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Probiotic-borne AR genes could be transferred to resident potential pathogens, other microbes harbored by the host, and/or environmental microbes, thereby increasing the ecological pool of antimicrobial resistance genes.

    “one concern is the theoretical situation in which probiotic-borne AR genes could be transferred to resident potential pathogens, other microbes harbored by the host, and/or environmental microbes, thereby increasing the ecological pool of antimicrobial resistance genes.15–17”

    From Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freedman, S. B., Schnadower, D., & Tarr, P. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • St. Louis Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2020-03-03
Volume
323
Issue
9
Pages
823
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W3009339137
Cited by
55
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
probiotics, probiotic supplements, health effects, evidence base, customer expectations, clinical practice, risk-benefit assessment
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Consumer Product Safety, Humans, Legislation, Drug, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Probiotics, Government Regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review