The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is accepted as a more effective approach to conventional open distal gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer. However, efficacy for locally advanced gastric cancer remains uncertain. Objective: To compare 3-year disease-free survival for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy or open distal gastrectomy. Design, Setting, and Patients: The study was a noninferiority, open-label, randomized clinical trial at 14 centers in China. A total of 1056 eligible patients with clinical stage T2, T3, or T4a gastric cancer without bulky nodes or distant metastases were enrolled from September 2012 to December 2014. Final follow-up was on December 31, 2017. Interventions: Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio after stratification by site, age, cancer stage, and histology to undergo either laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (n = 528) or open distal gastrectomy (n = 528) with D2 lymphadenectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival with a noninferiority margin of -10% to compare laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy. Secondary end points of 3-year overall survival and recurrence patterns were tested for superiority. Results: Among 1056 patients, 1039 (98.4%; mean age, 56.2 years; 313 [30.1%] women) had surgery (laparoscopic distal gastrectomy [n=519] vs open distal gastrectomy [n=520]), and 999 (94.6%) completed the study. Three-year disease-free survival rate was 76.5% in the laparoscopic distal gastrectomy group and 77.8% in the open distal gastrectomy group, absolute difference of -1.3% and a 1-sided 97.5% CI of -6.5% to ∞, not crossing the prespecified noninferiority margin. Three-year overall survival rate (laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy: 83.1% vs 85.2%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.64; P = .28) and cumulative incidence of recurrence over the 3-year period (laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy: 18.8% vs 16.5%; subhazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.54; P = .35) did not significantly differ between laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with a preoperative clinical stage indicating locally advanced gastric cancer, laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, compared with open distal gastrectomy, did not result in inferior disease-free survival at 3 years. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01609309.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wang, F., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Tang, L., Qu, X., Ying, J., Zhang, J., Sun, L., Lin, R., Qiu, H., et al. (2021) · Cancer Communications · doi:10.1002/cac2.12193 · Cited by 624
Self-citationZhang, X., Liang, H., Li, Z., Xue, Y., Wang, Y., Zhou, Z., Yu, J., Bu, Z., Chen, L., Du, Y., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00297-7 · Cited by 437
Self-citationWang, F., Zhang, X., Tang, L., Wu, Q., Cai, M., Li, Y., Qu, X., Qiu, H., Zhang, Y., Ying, J., et al. (2024) · Cancer Communications · doi:10.1002/cac2.12516 · Cited by 428
Self-citationSignaling pathways and therapeutic interventions in gastric cancer
Lei, Z.-N., Teng, Q.-X., Tian, Q., Chen, W., Xie, Y., Wu, K., Zeng, Q., Zeng, L., Pan, Y., Chen, Z.-S., et al. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01190-w · Cited by 322
Chen, Q.-Y., Xie, J.-W., Zhong, Q., Wang, J.-B., Lin, J.-X., Lu, J., Cao, L.-L., Lin, M., Tu, R.-H., Huang, Z.-N., et al. (2020) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6033 · Cited by 300
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, J., Huang, C., Sun, Y., Su, X., Cao, H., Hu, J., Wang, K., Suo, J., Tao, K., He, X., Wei, H., Ying, M., Hu, W., Du, X., Hu, Y., Liu, H., Zheng, C., Li, P., Xie, J., Liu, F., Li, Z., Zhao, G., Yang, K., Liu, C., Li, H., Chen, P., Ji, J., Li, G., & for the Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-05-28
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1983
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2947862269
- Cited by
- 690
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 62.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2019.5359
- The paper
- Yu, J., Huang, C., Sun, Y., Su, X., Cao, H., Hu, J., Wang, K., Suo, J., Tao, K., He, X., Wei, H., Ying, M., Hu, W., Du, X., Hu, Y., Liu, H., Zheng, C., Li, P., Xie, J., . . . for the Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group. (2019). Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.5359
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.