Cited by 8Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Online Mindfulness Therapy Improves Residual Depression

Slomski, Anita·2020·JAMA

Abstract

Patients whose depression lingered after treatment had less severe residual symptoms, higher rates of remission, and lower rates of relapse following online mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, a trial in JAMA Psychiatry reported.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2020.2446

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slomski, A.
Corresponding author
Slomski, Anita
Venue
JAMA
Published
2020-03-24
Volume
323
Issue
12
Pages
1124
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W3012851509
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
residual depression, depression remission, relapse prevention, digital mental health interventions, persistent depressive symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review