Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy on Event-Free Survival Among Children With High-risk First-Relapse B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Locatelli, Franco, Zugmaier, Gerhard, Rizzari, Carmelo, Morris, Joan D., Gruhn, Bernd, Klingebiel, Thomas, Parasole, Rosanna, Linderkamp, Christin, Flotho, Christian, Petit, Arnaud, Micalizzi, Concetta, Mergen, Noemi, Mohammad, Abeera, Kormany, William N., Eckert, Cornelia, Möricke, Anja, Sartor, Mary, Hrusak, Ondrej, Peters, Christina, Saha, Vaskar, Vinti, Luciana, von Stackelberg, Arend·2021·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Blinatumomab is a CD3/CD19-directed bispecific T-cell engager molecule with efficacy in children with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Objective: To evaluate event-free survival in children with high-risk first-relapse B-ALL after a third consolidation course with blinatumomab vs consolidation chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized phase 3 clinical trial, patients were enrolled November 2015 to July 2019 (data cutoff, July 17, 2019). Investigators at 47 centers in 13 countries enrolled children older than 28 days and younger than 18 years with high-risk first-relapse B-ALL in morphologic complete remission (M1 marrow, <5% blasts) or with M2 marrow (blasts ≥5% and <25%) at randomization. Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive 1 cycle of blinatumomab (n = 54; 15 μg/m 2 /d for 4 weeks, continuous intravenous infusion) or chemotherapy (n = 54) for the third consolidation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was event-free survival (events: relapse, death, second malignancy, or failure to achieve complete remission). The key secondary efficacy end point was overall survival. Other secondary end points included minimal residual disease remission and incidence of adverse events. Results: A total of 108 patients were randomized (median age, 5.0 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 4.0-10.5]; 51.9% girls; 97.2% M1 marrow) and all patients were included in the analysis. Enrollment was terminated early for benefit of blinatumomab in accordance with a prespecified stopping rule. After a median of 22.4 months of follow-up (IQR, 8.1-34.2), the incidence of events in the blinatumomab vs consolidation chemotherapy groups was 31% vs 57% (log-rank P < .001; hazard ratio [HR], 0.33 [95% CI, 0.18-0.61]). Deaths occurred in 8 patients (14.8%) in the blinatumomab group and 16 (29.6%) in the consolidation chemotherapy group. The overall survival HR was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.18-1.01). Minimal residual disease remission was observed in more patients in the blinatumomab vs consolidation chemotherapy group (90% [44/49] vs 54% [26/48]; difference, 35.6% [95% CI, 15.6%-52.5%]). No fatal adverse events were reported. In the blinatumomab vs consolidation chemotherapy group, the incidence of serious adverse events was 24.1% vs 43.1%, respectively, and the incidence of adverse events greater than or equal to grade 3 was 57.4% vs 82.4%. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 2 patients in the blinatumomab group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among children with high-risk first-relapse B-ALL, treatment with 1 cycle of blinatumomab compared with standard intensive multidrug chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant resulted in an improved event-free survival at a median of 22.4 months of follow-up. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02393859

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2021.0987

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Locatelli, F., Zugmaier, G., Rizzari, C., Morris, J. D., Gruhn, B., Klingebiel, T., Parasole, R., Linderkamp, C., Flotho, C., Petit, A., Micalizzi, C., Mergen, N., Mohammad, A., Kormany, W. N., Eckert, C., Möricke, A., Sartor, M., Hrusak, O., Peters, C., Saha, V., Vinti, L., & von Stackelberg, A.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2021-03-02
Volume
325
Issue
9
Pages
843
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W3134763925
Cited by
348
References
33
FWCI
46.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy on Event-Free Survival Among Children With High-risk First-Relapse B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2021.0987
The paper
Locatelli, F., Zugmaier, G., Rizzari, C., Morris, J. D., Gruhn, B., Klingebiel, T., Parasole, R., Linderkamp, C., Flotho, C., Petit, A., Micalizzi, C., Mergen, N., Mohammad, A., Kormany, W. N., Eckert, C., Möricke, A., Sartor, M., Hrusak, O., Peters, C., . . . von Stackelberg, A. (2021). Effect of Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy on Event-Free Survival Among Children With High-risk First-Relapse B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.0987

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.