Cited by 3,311Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsProbability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

A Multiple Testing Procedure for Clinical Trials

O'Brien, Peter C., Fleming, Thomas R.·1979·Biometrics

Abstract

A multiple testing procedure is proposed for comparing two treatments when response to treatment is both dichotomous (i.e., success or failure) and immediate. The proposed test statistic for each test is the usual (Pearson) chi-square statistic based on all data collected to that point. The maximum number (N) of tests and the number (m1 + m2) of observations collected between successive tests is fixed in advance. The overall size of the procedure is shown to be controlled with virtually the same accuracy as the single sample chi-square test based on N(m1 + m2) observations. The power is also found to be virtually the same. However, by affording the opportunity to terminate early when one treatment performs markedly better than the other, the multiple testing procedure may eliminate the ethical dilemmas that often accompany clinical trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2530245

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because one interim analysis used a stopping boundary based on an alpha spending function of the O'Brien-Fleming type, a critical P value of 0.048 was required for the primary hypothesis.

    “Because one interim analysis used a stopping boundary that was based on an alpha spending function of the O'Brien-Fleming type, 10 a critical P value of 0.048 was required for the primary hypothesis.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Brien, P. C., & Fleming, T. R.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Biometrics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1979-09
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
549
ISSN
0006-341X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059707463
Cited by
3,311
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 131 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 107 · 2014: 153 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 130
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biometrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
multiple comparisons, early stopping, clinical trials, binary outcomes, sequential testing, chi-square test, treatment comparison, type I error control, statistical power
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review