Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 601

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Four-Month Clinical Status of a Cohort of Patients After Hospitalization for COVID-19

Open access
The Writing Committee for the COMEBAC Study Group, Morin, Luc, Savale, Laurent, Pham, Tài, Colle, Romain, Figueiredo, Samy, Harrois, Anatole, Gasnier, Matthieu, Lecoq, Anne-Lise, Meyrignac, Olivier, Noel, Nicolas, Baudry, Elodie, Bellin, Marie-France, Beurnier, Antoine, Choucha, Walid, Corruble, Emmanuelle, Dortet, Laurent, Hardy-Leger, Isabelle, Radiguer, François, Sportouch, Sabine, Verny, Christiane, Wyplosz, Benjamin, Zaidan, Mohamad, Becquemont, Laurent, Montani, David, Monnet, Xavier·2021·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Little is known about long-term sequelae of COVID-19. Objective: To describe the consequences at 4 months in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a prospective uncontrolled cohort study, survivors of COVID-19 who had been hospitalized in a university hospital in France between March 1 and May 29, 2020, underwent a telephone assessment 4 months after discharge, between July 15 and September 18, 2020. Patients with relevant symptoms and all patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit (ICU) were invited for further assessment at an ambulatory care visit. Exposures: Survival of hospitalization for COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: Respiratory, cognitive, and functional symptoms were assessed by telephone with the Q3PC cognitive screening questionnaire and a checklist of symptoms. At the ambulatory care visit, patients underwent pulmonary function tests, lung computed tomographic scan, psychometric and cognitive tests (including the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and 20-item Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory), and, for patients who had been hospitalized in the ICU or reported ongoing symptoms, echocardiography. Results: Among 834 eligible patients, 478 were evaluated by telephone (mean age, 61 years [SD, 16 years]; 201 men, 277 women). During the telephone interview, 244 patients (51%) declared at least 1 symptom that did not exist before COVID-19: fatigue in 31%, cognitive symptoms in 21%, and new-onset dyspnea in 16%. There was further evaluation in 177 patients (37%), including 97 of 142 former ICU patients. The median 20-item Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory score (n = 130) was 4.5 (interquartile range, 3.0-5.0) for reduced motivation and 3.7 (interquartile range, 3.0-4.5) for mental fatigue (possible range, 1 [best] to 5 [worst]). The median 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey score (n = 145) was 25 (interquartile range, 25.0-75.0) for the subscale "role limited owing to physical problems" (possible range, 0 [best] to 100 [worst]). Computed tomographic lung-scan abnormalities were found in 108 of 171 patients (63%), mainly subtle ground-glass opacities. Fibrotic lesions were observed in 33 of 171 patients (19%), involving less than 25% of parenchyma in all but 1 patient. Fibrotic lesions were observed in 19 of 49 survivors (39%) with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Among 94 former ICU patients, anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic symptoms were observed in 23%, 18%, and 7%, respectively. The left ventricular ejection fraction was less than 50% in 8 of 83 ICU patients (10%). New-onset chronic kidney disease was observed in 2 ICU patients. Serology was positive in 172 of 177 outpatients (97%). Conclusions and Relevance: Four months after hospitalization for COVID-19, a cohort of patients frequently reported symptoms not previously present, and lung-scan abnormalities were common among those who were tested. These findings are limited by the absence of a control group and of pre-COVID assessments in this cohort. Further research is needed to understand longer-term outcomes and whether these findings reflect associations with the disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2021.3331

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 601

Metadata

Authors
The Writing Committee for the COMEBAC Study Group, Morin, L., Savale, L., Pham, T., Colle, R., Figueiredo, S., Harrois, A., Gasnier, M., Lecoq, A.-L., Meyrignac, O., Noel, N., Baudry, E., Bellin, M.-F., Beurnier, A., Choucha, W., Corruble, E., Dortet, L., Hardy-Leger, I., Radiguer, F., Sportouch, S., Verny, C., Wyplosz, B., Zaidan, M., Becquemont, L., Montani, D., & Monnet, X.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2021-04-20
Volume
325
Issue
15
Pages
1525
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W3138791341
Cited by
601
References
31
FWCI
56.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Four-Month Clinical Status of a Cohort of Patients After Hospitalization for COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2021.3331
The paper
The Writing Committee for the COMEBAC Study Group, Morin, L., Savale, L., Pham, T., Colle, R., Figueiredo, S., Harrois, A., Gasnier, M., Lecoq, A.-L., Meyrignac, O., Noel, N., Baudry, E., Bellin, M.-F., Beurnier, A., Choucha, W., Corruble, E., Dortet, L., Hardy-Leger, I., Radiguer, F., . . . Monnet, X. (2021). Four-Month Clinical Status of a Cohort of Patients After Hospitalization for COVID-19. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.3331

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.