Accuracy of electronic health record food insecurity, housing instability, and financial strain screening in adult primary care
Open accessAbstract
This study assesses the accuracy of electronic health record–based screening questionnaires about social risk factors using external single-domain questionnaires as a comparator.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The literature on social risk factor documentation is hampered by a lack of data about the true prevalence of social risks in the clinical populations being studied.
“But this literature is hampered by a lack of data about the true prevalence of social risks in the clinical populations being studied.[6][7][8][9]”
From Structured and unstructured social risk factor documentation in the electronic health record underestimates patients’ self-reported risks (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Iott, B. E., Rivas, S., Gottlieb, L. M., Adler-Milstein, J., & Pantell, M. S. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad261 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Development and Validation of Computable Social Phenotypes for Health‐Related Social Needs
Gregory, M. E., Kasthurirathne, S. N., Magoc, T., McNamee, C., Harle, C. A., & Vest, J. R. (2024) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae150 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Harle, C. A., Wu, W., & Vest, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida Health (US)
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vest, Joshua R.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2023-02-07
- Volume
- 329
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 423
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- PMC
- PMC10408256
- OpenAlex
- W4319333207
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS028636)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Keywords
- electronic health records, food insecurity, housing instability, financial stress, social risk factors, screening questionnaire, screening accuracy, primary care, social determinants of health
- MeSH terms
- Food Insecurity, Housing Instability, Costs and Cost Analysis, Food Supply, Health Surveys, Housing, Mass Screening, Primary Health Care, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
