Cited by 2Machine Learning in HealthcareMedical Coding and Health InformationHealth disparities and outcomes

Development and Validation of Computable Social Phenotypes for Health‐Related Social Needs

Open access
Gregory, Megan E, Kasthurirathne, Suranga N, Magoc, Tanja, McNamee, Cassidy, Harle, Christopher A, Vest, Joshua R·2024·JAMIA Open

Abstract

Objective: Measurement of health-related social needs (HRSNs) is complex. We sought to develop and validate computable phenotypes (CPs) using structured electronic health record (EHR) data for food insecurity, housing instability, financial insecurity, transportation barriers, and a composite-type measure of these, using human-defined rule-based and machine learning (ML) classifier approaches. Materials and Methods: We collected HRSN surveys as the reference standard and obtained EHR data from 1550 patients in 3 health systems from 2 states. We followed a Delphi-like approach to develop the human-defined rule-based CP. For the ML classifier approach, we trained supervised ML (XGBoost) models using 78 features. Using surveys as the reference standard, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC). We compared AUCs using the Delong test and other performance measures using McNemar's test, and checked for differential performance. Results: Most patients (63%) reported at least one HRSN on the reference standard survey. Human-defined rule-based CPs exhibited poor performance (AUCs=.52 to .68). ML classifier CPs performed significantly better, but still poor-to-fair (AUCs = .68 to .75). Significant differences for race/ethnicity were found for ML classifier CPs (higher AUCs for White non-Hispanic patients). Important features included number of encounters and Medicaid insurance. Discussion: Using a supervised ML classifier approach, HRSN CPs approached thresholds of fair performance, but exhibited differential performance by race/ethnicity. Conclusion: CPs may help to identify patients who may benefit from additional social needs screening. Future work should explore the use of area-level features via geospatial data and natural language processing to improve model performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae150

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [27]Gehrmann S, Dernoncourt F, Li Y, et al Comparing rule-based and deep learning models for patient phenotyping. 2017. Accessed December 31, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.08705 · arXiv
  2. [45]Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2016: 785- 994.
  3. [46]Lundberg S, Lee S-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. 2017. Accessed December 31, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07874 · arXiv
  4. [53]Department of Health & Human Services. Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and policy changes and fiscal year 2023 rates; quality programs and Medicare promoting interoperability program requirements for eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals; costs incurred for qualified and non-qualified deferred compensation plans; and changes to hospital and critical access hospital conditions of participation. Fed Regist. 2022; 87: 48780- 49499.
  5. [67]National Academies of Sciences Engineering, Medicine. Integrating Social Care into the Delivery of Health Care: Moving Upstream to Improve the Nation’s Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2019. 31940159

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gregory, M. E., Kasthurirathne, S. N., Magoc, T., McNamee, C., Harle, C. A., & Vest, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
  • Quality and Patient Safety, College of Medicine, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL 32610,
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Gregory, Megan E
Venue
JAMIA Open
Published
2024-12-26
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
ooae150-ooae150
ISSN
2574-2531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406120227
Cited by
2
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMIA Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Indiana University Pervasive Technology Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
health-related social needs, computable phenotypes, food insecurity, housing instability, financial insecurity, transportation barriers, social needs screening, electronic health records, XGBoost classifier, algorithmic fairness, racial and ethnic disparities, Medicaid, social determinants of health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review