Cited by 97Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesStreptococcal Infections and Treatments

Calcific Aortic Stenosis: A Review

Otto, Catherine M., Newby, David E., Hillis, Graham S.·2024·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Calcific aortic stenosis (AS) restricts the aortic valve opening during systole due to calcification and fibrosis of either a congenital bicuspid or a normal trileaflet aortic valve. In the US, AS affects 1% to 2% of adults older than 65 years and approximately 12% of adults older than 75 years. Worldwide, AS leads to more than 100 000 deaths annually. Observations: Calcific AS is characterized by aortic valve leaflet lipid infiltration and inflammation with subsequent fibrosis and calcification. Symptoms due to severe AS, such as exercise intolerance, exertional dyspnea, and syncope, are associated with a 1-year mortality rate of up to 50% without aortic valve replacement. Echocardiography can detect AS and measure the severity of aortic valve dysfunction. Although progression rates vary, once aortic velocity is higher than 2 m/s, progression to severe AS occurs typically within 10 years. Severe AS is defined by an aortic velocity 4 m/s or higher, a mean gradient 40 mm Hg or higher, or a valve area less than or equal to 1.0 cm 2 . Management of mild to moderate AS and asymptomatic severe AS consists of patient education about the typical progression of disease; clinical and echocardiographic surveillance at intervals of 3 to 5 years for mild AS, 1 to 2 years for moderate AS, and 6 to 12 months for severe AS; and treatment of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and cigarette smoking as indicated. When a patient with severe AS develops symptoms, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is recommended, which restores an average life expectancy; in patients aged older than 70 years with a low surgical risk, 10-year all-cause mortality was 62.7% with TAVI and 64.0% with SAVR. TAVI is associated with decreased length of hospitalization, more rapid return to normal activities, and less pain compared with SAVR. However, evidence supporting TAVI for patients aged younger than 65 years and long-term outcomes of TAVI are less well defined than for SAVR. For patients with symptomatic severe AS, the 2020 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline recommends SAVR for individuals aged 65 years and younger, SAVR or TAVI for those aged 66 to 79 years, and TAVI for individuals aged 80 years and older or those with an estimated surgical mortality of 8% or higher. Conclusions: Calcific AS is a common chronic progressive condition among older adults and is diagnosed via echocardiography. Symptomatic patients with severe AS have a mortality rate of up to 50% after 1 year, but treatment with SAVR or TAVI reduces mortality to that of age-matched control patients. The type and timing of valve replacement should be built on evidence-based guidelines, shared decision-making, and involvement of a multidisciplinary heart valve team.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2024.16477

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of aortic stenosis rises steeply with age, affecting approximately 1-2% of adults older than 65 years and about 12% of those older than 75 years.

    “The prevalence of AS rises steeply with age, affecting approximately 1–2% of adults older than 65 years and about 12% of those older than 75 years, while definitive diagnosis and severity grading still rely on echocardiography.41”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Otto, C. M., Newby, D. E., & Hillis, G. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2024-12-17
Volume
332
Issue
23
Pages
2014
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4404229343
Cited by
97
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 27
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation (RG/F/22/110093)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
Keywords
calcific aortic stenosis, aortic valve calcification, aortic valve fibrosis, disease progression, echocardiographic monitoring, surgical aortic valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, aortic valve replacement outcomes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, elderly patients, mortality, guideline recommendations, bicuspid aortic valve, trileaflet aortic valve
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Valve, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Calcinosis, Echocardiography, Humans, Disease Progression, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review