Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 103Academic integrity and plagiarismAcademic Writing and PublishingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reporting Use of AI in Research and Scholarly Publication—JAMA Network Guidance

Abstract

Nonhuman "Authors" and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2024.3471

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Instructions for Authors. Accessed March 4, 2024. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/pages/instructions-for-authors

Cited by

See all 103

Metadata

Authors
Flanagin, A., Pirracchio, R., Khera, R., Berkwits, M., Hswen, Y., & Bibbins-Domingo, K.
Affiliations
  • Executive Managing Editor, JAMA and JAMA Network
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • JAMA and JAMA Network
  • Editor in Chief, JAMA and JAMA Network
Corresponding author
Flanagin, Annette
Venue
JAMA
Published
2024-04-02
Volume
331
Issue
13
Pages
1096
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4392563403
Cited by
103
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 14
FWCI
40.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, AI-generated content, authorship, scientific integrity, scholarly publishing, research reporting, medical knowledge
MeSH terms
Publishing, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.