Cited by 68Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disordersCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Efficacy and Safety of Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor Enlicitide in Adults With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Ballantyne, Christie M., Gellis, Laura, Tardif, Jean-Claude, Banka, Puja, Navar, Ann Marie, Asprusten, Emil Andreas, Scott, Russell, Stroes, Erik S. G. +4 more·2026·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Persons with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) are at increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease due to lifelong elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Many patients with HeFH do not achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C goals with the currently available lipid-lowering therapies. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of enlicitide decanoate (an oral proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor) vs placebo in adults with HeFH requiring further lowering of LDL-C levels despite use of statin therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, randomized clinical trial included persons aged 18 years or older with HeFH currently using lipid-lowering therapy (taking at least a moderate- or high-intensity statin) and either an LDL-C level of 55 mg/dL or greater and a history of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or an LDL-C level of 70 mg/dL or greater without a history of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The trial was conducted at 59 sites across 17 countries; the first participant was screened on August 8, 2023, and the last follow-up visit occurred on April 7, 2025. Interventions: Participants were randomized (2:1) to 20 mg of enlicitide (n = 202) or placebo (n = 101) once daily for 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the mean percentage change in LDL-C level at week 24. The secondary outcomes included the mean percentage change in LDL-C level at week 52, the mean percentage change at week 24 in levels of non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B, and the median percentage change at week 24 in lipoprotein(a). Results: Of the 303 participants (mean age, 52.4 [SD, 13.5] years; 51% were female) randomized, 293 (96.7%) completed the trial. The mean LDL-C level was 119.0 mg/dL (SD, 41.0 mg/dL) at baseline, all had statin current use (81.5% were taking a high-intensity statin), and 64.4% were taking ezetimibe. The mean percentage change in LDL-C level at week 24 was −58.2% in the enlicitide group vs 2.6% in the placebo group (between-group difference, −59.4% [95% CI, −65.6% to −53.2%]; P < .001). The mean percentage change in LDL-C level at week 52 was −55.3% in the enlicitide group vs 8.7% in the placebo group (between-group difference, −61.5% [95% CI, −69.4% to −53.7%]; P < .001). At week 24, the mean percentage change in non–HDL-C level was −52.3% in the enlicitide group vs 2.1% in the placebo group (between-group difference, −53.0% [95% CI, −58.5% to −47.4%]; P < .001), the mean percentage change in apolipoprotein B level was −48.2% vs 1.8%, respectively (between-group difference, −49.1% [95% CI, −54.0% to −44.3%]; P < .001), and the median percentage change in lipoprotein(a) level was −24.7% vs −1.6% (between-group difference, −27.5% [95% CI, −34.3% to −20.6%]; P < .001). The incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, and study discontinuation due to adverse events was similar between groups. Conclusions: Among adults with HeFH, treatment with enlicitide was well tolerated and significantly reduced levels of LDL-C, apolipoprotein B, non–HDL-C, and lipoprotein(a). Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05952869

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2025.20620

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Safety data for oral PCSK9 inhibitors remained limited, with the longest oral PCSK9 inhibitor trial duration being 52 weeks.

    “However, unlike injectable PCSK9 inhibitors, which are supported by a broad safety literature with follow-up durations extending beyond 5 years[29], safety data for oral agents remained limited, with the longest oral PCSK9 inhibitor trial duration being 52 weeks[5].”

    From Oral PCSK9 inhibitors for elevated LDL-C: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials (2026) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Trial Design reports 52 weeks of treatment, and the Assessments section says safety was monitored throughout the trial. The paper does not establish that 52 weeks was the longest duration of any oral PCSK9 inhibitor trial or explicitly assess the extent of safety data for oral agents as a class. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three studies were phase 2 trials with different dose ranges, while two were phase 3 trials evaluating a fixed dose of the medication.

    “Three studies were phase 2 trials with different dose ranges [[10], [11], [12]], while two were phase 3 trials evaluating a fixed dose of the medication [5,6].”
  • Recent phase 3 randomized trials, including CORALreef, showed that MK-0616 (enlicitide decanoate) produces large placebo-adjusted reductions in LDL-C, together with concordant lowering of non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a), and with an adverse event profile comparable to placebo.

    “Oral PCSK9 inhibitors have emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy, supported by recent phase 3 randomized trials, including the CORALreef trials, which showed that MK-0616 (renamed as enlicitide decanoate) produces large placebo-adjusted reductions in LDL-C, together with concordant lowering of non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a), and with an adverse event profile compar”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, et al; European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(45):3478-3490. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ eht273 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Zhang Y, Pletcher MJ, Vittinghoff E, et al. Association between cumulative low-density lipoprotein cholesterol exposure during young adulthood and middle age and risk of cardiovascular events. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(12):1406-1413. doi:10. 1001/jamacardio.2021.3508 · DOI · Paper page
  3. LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, et al; Treating to New Targets (TNT) Investigators. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(14):1425- 1435. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa050461 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cannon CP, de Lemos JA, Rosenson RS, et al; GOULD Investigators. Use of lipid-lowering therapies over 2 years in GOULD, a registry of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the US. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(9):1060-1068. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.1810 · DOI
  5. Fox KM, Tai MH, Kostev K, Hatz M, Qian Y, Laufs U. Treatment patterns and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment among patients receiving high-or moderate-intensity statins. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018; 107(5):380-388. doi:10.1007/s00392-017-1193-z · DOI
  6. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/ APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(24):3168-3209. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11. 002 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Ray KK, Molemans B, Schoonen WM, et al; DA VINCI Study. EU-wide cross-sectional observational study of lipid-modifying therapy use in secondary and primary care: the DA VINCI study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28(11):1279-1289. doi:10. 1093/eurjpc/zwaa047 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ginsberg HN, Rader DJ, Raal FJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and LDL-C of 160 mg/dL or higher. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2016;30(5):473-483. doi:10.1007/ s10557-016-6685-y · DOI
  9. Santos RD, Stein EA, Hovingh GK, et al. Long-term evolocumab in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75 (6):565-574. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.020 · DOI
  10. MacDougall DE, Baum SJ, Ahmed CD, McGowan MP, Wilemon KA. Trends in patient access to and utilization of prescribed PCSK9 inhibitors in a large US claims database from 2015 to 2021. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024;17 (2):e009988. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123. 009988 · DOI
  11. Johns DG, Campeau LC, Banka P, et al. Orally bioavailable macrocyclic peptide that inhibits binding of PCSK9 to the low density lipoprotein receptor. Circulation. 2023;148(2):144-158. doi:10. 1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.063372 · DOI
  12. Li H, Thaisrivongs DA, Shang G, et al. Total synthesis of enlicitide decanoate. J Am Chem Soc. 2025;147(13):11036-11048. doi:10.1021/jacs.4c15966 · DOI
  13. Ballantyne CM, Banka P, Mendez G, et al. Phase 2b randomized trial of the oral PCSK9 inhibitor MK-0616. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81(16): 1553-1564. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.018 · DOI
  14. Hopewell S, Chan AW, Collins GS, et al. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomized trials. JAMA. 2025;333(22): 1998-2005. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.4347 · DOI
  15. Gidding SS, Champagne MA, de Ferranti SD, et al; American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Young Committee of Council on Cardiovascular Disease in Young, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology, and Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health. The agenda for familial hypercholesterolemia: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132(22):2167-2192. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000297 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Koren MJ, Scott R, Kim JB, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 as monotherapy in patients with hypercholesterol- aemia (MENDEL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet. 2012; 380(9858):1995-2006. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12) 61771-1 · DOI
  17. McGowan MP, Hosseini Dehkordi SH, Moriarty PM, Duell PB. Diagnosis and treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(24):e013225. doi:10.1161/ JAHA.119.013225 · DOI
  18. Wilkins JT, Lloyd-Jones DM. Novel lipid-lowering therapies to reduce cardiovascular risk. JAMA. 2021;326(3):266-267. doi:10.1001/jama. 2021.2244 · DOI
  19. Lloyd-Jones DM, Morris PB, Ballantyne CM, et al; Writing Committee. 2022 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on the role of nonstatin therapies for LDL-cholesterol lowering in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology solution set oversight committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(14):1366-1418. doi:10.1016/ j.jacc.2022.07.006 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: developed by the task force for cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies with the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022;75(5):429. doi:10.1016/j. rec.2022.04.003 · DOI
  21. Mach F, Koskinas KC, Roeters van Lennep JE, et al; ESC/EAS Scientific Document Group. 2025 focused update of the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Atherosclerosis. 2025;409:120479. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis. 2025.120479 · DOI
  22. Nicholls S, Nelson A, Ditmarsch M, et al. Safety and efficacy of obicetrapib in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2025;19(3)(suppl):e91. doi:10.1016/j.jacl. 2025.04.129 · DOI
  23. Nicholls SJ, Nelson AJ, Ditmarsch M, et al; BROADWAY Investigators. Safety and efficacy of obicetrapib in patients at high cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2025;393(1):51-61. doi:10.1056/ NEJMoa2415820 · DOI
  24. Kastelein JJ, Ginsberg HN, Langslet G, et al. ODYSSEY FH I and FH II: 78 week results with alirocumab treatment in 735 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(43):2996-3003. doi:10.1093/ eurheartj/ehv370 · DOI
  25. Raal F, Scott R, Somaratne R, et al. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering effects of AMG 145, a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 serine protease in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: the Reduction of LDL-C with PCSK9 Inhibition in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Disorder (RUTHERFORD) randomized trial. Circulation. 2012;126(20):2408- 2417. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.144055 · DOI
  26. Raal FJ, Stein EA, Dufour R, et al. PCSK9 inhibition with evolocumab (AMG 145) in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (RUTHERFORD-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9965): 331-340. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61399-4 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hartgers ML, Besseling J, Stroes ES, et al. Achieved LDL cholesterol levels in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a model that explores the efficacy of conventional and novel lipid-lowering therapy. J Clin Lipidol. 2018;12(4):972-980.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2018.04. 002 · DOI
  28. Bruckert E, Parhofer KG, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, et al. Proportion of high-risk/very high-risk patients in Europe with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at target according to European guidelines: a systematic review. Adv Ther. 2020;37(5):1724-1736. doi:10.1007/s12325-020-01285-2 · DOI
  29. De Luca L, Arca M, Temporelli PL, et al. Prevalence and pharmacologic management of familial hypercholesterolemia in an unselected contemporary cohort of patients with stable coronary artery disease. Clin Cardiol. 2018;41(8): 1075-1083. doi:10.1002/clc.23031 · DOI
  30. Kotseva K, De Backer G, De Bacquer D, et al. Lifestyle and impact on cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary patients across 27 countries: results from the European Society of Cardiology ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V registry. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26(8):824-835. doi:10.1177/ 2047487318825350 · DOI
  31. Kastelein JJ, Akdim F, Stroes ES, et al. Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(14): 1431-1443. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0800742 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballantyne, C. M., Gellis, L., Tardif, J.-C., Banka, P., Navar, A. M., Asprusten, E. A., Scott, R., Stroes, E. S. G., Froman, S., Mendizabal, G., Wang, F., & Catapano, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Montreal Heart Institute (CA)
  • Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • NZ Clinical Research, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • MSD Argentina, Munro
  • MSD (China) Investment Co., Ltd. (China) (CN)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Ballantyne, Christie M.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2026-01-13
Volume
335
Issue
2
Pages
129
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4416054854
Cited by
68
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 4
FWCI
63.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Pfizer
  • Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal
  • Esperion Therapeutics
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
PCSK9 inhibitors, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, LDL cholesterol lowering, statin therapy, non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein(a), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, LDL-C goal attainment, drug safety, adverse events, hypercholesterolemia, lipid-lowering therapy
MeSH terms
Proprotein Convertase 9, PCSK9 Inhibitors, Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, Apolipoproteins B, Double-Blind Method, Female, Heterozygote, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Lipoprotein(a), Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review