The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data. The role of length of stay and comorbidities
Abstract
To assess the meaning of hospital-associated death rates, we studied whether mortality within 30 days of hospital admission (30-day mortality) is more informative than inpatient mortality and whether detailed assessment of additional discharge diagnoses helps in understanding death rates. We examined hospitalizations for elderly Medicare patients with principal diagnoses of stroke, bacterial pneumonia, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure; these conditions account for 30.8% of Medicare 30-day mortality. Average hospital stays for these conditions were 99.0% longer, and inpatient mortality was 25.0% higher in New York than in California, but 30-day mortality was 1.6% higher in California. We conclude that inpatient death rates depend on length-of-stay patterns and give a biased picture of mortality. Additional diagnoses such as shock and pneumonia were strongly associated with increased mortality, but Medicare data do not reveal which patients had these conditions at the time of admission. Recorded diagnoses of chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, benign prostatic hypertrophy, and osteoarthritis were commonly associated with reduced risk of death; such reduced risk is not clinically plausible. Several lines of evidence suggest that chronic disorders are underreported for patients with life-threatening disorders. We recommend great caution in using discharge diagnoses of comorbid conditions to adjust hospital death rates for clinical differences in the patient populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.
Elixhauser, A., Steiner, C., Harris, D. R., & Coffey, R. M. (1998) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004 · Cited by 9,921
Practical considerations on the use of the charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases
D'Hoore, W., Bouckaert, A., & Tilquin, C. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00271-5 · Cited by 893
Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in cancer: a systematic review of the literature
Knight, K., Wade, S., & Balducci, L. (2004) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.008 · Cited by 878
Incidence and Mortality of Acute Renal Failure in Medicare Beneficiaries, 1992 to 2001
Xue, J. L., Daniels, F., Star, R. A., Kimmel, P. L., Eggers, P. W., Molitoris, B. A., Himmelfarb, J., & Collins, A. J. (2006) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2005060668 · Cited by 765
Hannan, E. L. (1989) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430040075029 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Jencks, S. F.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1988-10-21
- Volume
- 260
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2240-2246
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4232772004
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data. The role of length of stay and comorbidities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.260.15.2240
- The paper
- Jencks, S. F. (1988). Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data. The role of length of stay and comorbidities. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.260.15.2240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.