Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 614

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

Consensus conference. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion

·1988·JAMA

Abstract

Transfusion of red blood cells is a lifesaving measure in the management of a variety of medical and surgical conditions. The acquired immunodeficiency syndrome epidemic has raised the level of apprehension regarding the transmission of infectious disease by transfusion. This has stimulated a reexamination of the benefit-to-risk relationship for transfusion therapy. For many patients, homologous red blood cell transfusion carries great benefits, permitting surgical procedures that otherwise would not be possible and allowing medical therapies for patients who are or may become anemic. Blood transfusions once were believed to be relatively safe, but many physicians and patients recently have come to regard them as potentially dangerous. As with all potent and effective therapies, homologous blood transfusion carries risks along with benefits. About two thirds of all red blood cell transfusions are given in the perioperative period. Newer knowledge of physiology and of the effects of anemia during and after surgery

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1001/jama.260.18.2700

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 614

Metadata

Venue
JAMA
Publisher
American Medical Association
Published
1988-11-11
Volume
260
Issue
18
Pages
2700-2703
ISSN
0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2730003010
Cited by
614
References
0
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus conference. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.260.18.2700
The paper
Consensus conference. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion. (1988). JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.260.18.2700

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.