Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Variability in Transfusion Practice for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Persists Despite National Consensus Guidelines: A 24-Institution Study

Stover, Price E., Siegel, Lawrence C., Parks, Reg, Levin, Jack, Body, Simon C., Maddi, Rosemarie, D'Ambra, Michael N., Mangano, Dennis T., Spiess, Bruce D.·1998·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background: An estimated 20% of allogeneic blood transfusions in the United States are associated with cardiac surgery. National consensus guidelines for allogeneic transfusion associated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery have existed since the mid- to late 1980s. The appropriateness and uniformity of institutional transfusion practice was questioned in 1991. An assessment of current transfusion practice patterns was warranted. Methods: The Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia database consists of comprehensive information on the course of surgery in 2,417 randomly selected patients undergoing CABG surgery at 24 institutions. A subset of 713 patients expected to be at low risk for transfusion was examined. Allogeneic transfusion was evaluated across institutions. Institution as an independent risk factor for allogeneic transfusion was determined in a multivariable model. Results: Significant variability in institutional transfusion practice was observed for allogeneic packed red blood cells (PRBCs) (27-92% of patients transfused) and hemostatic blood components (platelets, 0-36%; fresh frozen plasma, 0-36%; cryoprecipitate, 0-17% of patients transfused). For patients at institutions with liberal rather than conservative transfusion practice, the odds ratio for transfusion of PRBCs was 6.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-10.8) and for hemostatic blood components it was 2 (95% CI, 1.2-3.4). Institution was an independent determinant of transfusion risk associated with CABG surgery. Conclusions: Institutions continue to vary significantly in their transfusion practices for CABG surgery. A more rational and conservative approach to transfusion practice at the institutional level is warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000542-199802000-00009

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
Stover, P. E., Siegel, L. C., Parks, R., Levin, J., Body, S. C., Maddi, R., D'Ambra, M. N., Mangano, D. T., & Spiess, B. D.
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
1998-02-01
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
327-333
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129515316
Cited by
423
References
7
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variability in Transfusion Practice for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Persists Despite National Consensus Guidelines: A 24-Institution Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000542-199802000-00009
The paper
Stover, P. E., Siegel, L. C., Parks, R., Levin, J., Body, S. C., Maddi, R., D'Ambra, M. N., Mangano, D. T., & Spiess, B. D. (1998). Variability in Transfusion Practice for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Persists Despite National Consensus Guidelines: A 24-Institution Study. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199802000-00009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.