The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chronic fatigue in primary care. Prevalence, patient characteristics, and outcome
Abstract
Although fatigue is one of the most common complaints in ambulatory care, research has been minimal. Of the 1159 consecutive patients surveyed in two adult primary-care clinics, 276 (24%) indicated that fatigue was a major problem. Fatigue was more prevalent in women than in men (28% vs 19%). Extensive clinical, laboratory, psychometric, and functional data were gathered for 102 fatigued patients and 26 controls. Laboratory testing was not useful in detecting unsuspected medical conditions or in determining the cause of fatigue. Depression or somatic anxiety or both were suggested by screening psychometric instruments in 82 fatigued patients (80%) compared with three controls (12%). Global dysfunction was marked, as reported by patients on the Sickness Impact Profile. The mean score on the Sickness Impact Profile of 11.3 for fatigued patients is similar to that reported for patients with major medical illnesses. After one year of follow-up, only 29 fatigued patients (28%) had improved. The high prevalence, persistence, and functional consequences of fatigue mandate a search for effective therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robins, L. N. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 · Cited by 5,219
Cited by
The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Comprehensive Approach to Its Definition and Study
Fukuda, K., Straus, S. E., Hickie, I., Sharpe, M. C., Dobbins, J. G., Komaroff, A., & and International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. (1994) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-121-12-199412150-00009 · Cited by 4,969
Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome
Vercoulen, J. H. M. M., Swanink, C. M. A., Fennis, J. F. M., Galama, J. M. D., van der Meer, J. W. M., & Bleijenberg, G. (1994) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(94)90099-x · Cited by 1,306
Common symptoms in ambulatory care: incidence, evaluation, therapy, and outcome
Kroenke, K., & Mangelsdorff, A. D. (1989) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(89)90293-3 · Cited by 947
A community-based study of chronic fatigue syndrome.
Jason, L. A., Richman, J. A., Rademaker, A. W., Jordan, K. M., Plioplys, A. V., Taylor, R. R., McCready, W., Huang, C.-F., & Plioplys, S. (1999) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.159.18.2129 · Cited by 811
Deary, V., Chalder, T., & Sharpe, M. (2007) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2007.07.002 · Cited by 480
Metadata
- Authors
- Kroenke, K.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1988-08-19
- Volume
- 260
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 929-934
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4235673608
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic fatigue in primary care. Prevalence, patient characteristics, and outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.260.7.929
- The paper
- Kroenke, K. (1988). Chronic fatigue in primary care. Prevalence, patient characteristics, and outcome. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.260.7.929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.