The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Case for Using Industrial Quality Management Science in Health Care Organizations
Abstract
In an effort to provide health care of optimal quality, providers traditionally assess or measure performance and then assure that it conforms to standards. In cases where performance fails to conform, providers attempt to modify or improve physician behavior. The analytic scope of this traditional paradigm may not be broad enough to allow modern health care organizations to provide optimal care. At a theoretical and practical level, many conceptual limitations inherent in the traditional approach are addressed in modern industrial quality science. A fundamental principle of industrial quality control is the recognition, analysis, and elimination of variation. Based on rigorous analysis of variation in outcomes and processes, industrial quality experts have developed principles and techniques for quality improvement. Health care organizations may well make important advances in the quality of care and service through the application of these principles and techniques. (JAMA. 1989;262:2869-2873)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Donabedian, A. (1988) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.260.12.1743 · Cited by 5,895
Marton, K. I. (1985) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1985.00360050060009 · Cited by 91
Cited by
Westphal, J. D., Gulati, R., & Shortell, S. M. (1997) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393924 · Cited by 1,457
Ferlie, E. B., & Shortell, S. M. (2001) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00206 · Cited by 1,335
Planning and Studying Improvement in Patient Care: The Use of Theoretical Perspectives
GROL, R. P. T. M., BOSCH, M. C., HULSCHER, M. E. J. L., ECCLES, M. P., & WENSING, M. (2007) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x · Cited by 943
Understanding the Components of Quality Improvement Collaboratives: A Systematic Literature Review
NADEEM, E., OLIN, S. S., HILL, L. C., HOAGWOOD, K. E., & HORWITZ, S. M. (2013) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/milq.12016 · Cited by 332
Brown, C. H., Chamberlain, P., Saldana, L., Padgett, C., Wang, W., & Cruden, G. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0134-8 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Laffel, G.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1989-11-24
- Volume
- 262
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2869
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4299080457
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 54.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Case for Using Industrial Quality Management Science in Health Care Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1989.03430200113036
- The paper
- Laffel, G. (1989). The Case for Using Industrial Quality Management Science in Health Care Organizations. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1989.03430200113036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.