Cited by 5,895Healthcare Quality and ManagementPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

The Quality of Care

Donabedian, Avedis·1988·JAMA

Abstract

Before assessment can begin we must decide how quality is to be defined and that depends on whether one assesses only the performance of practitioners or also the contributions of patients and of the health care system; on how broadly health and responsibility for health are defined; on whether the maximally effective or optimally effective care is sought; and on whether individual or social preferences define the optimum. We also need detailed information about the causal linkages among the structural attributes of the settings in which care occurs, the processes of care, and the outcomes of care. Specifying the components or outcomes of care to be sampled, formulating the appropriate criteria and standards, and obtaining the necessary information are the steps that follow. Though we know much about assessing quality, much remains to be known.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donabedian, A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Donabedian, Avedis
Venue
JAMA
Published
1988-09-23
Volume
260
Issue
12
Pages
1743
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1970926607
Cited by
5,895
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 224 · 2023: 349 · 2022: 216 · 2021: 331 · 2020: 369 · 2019: 355 · 2018: 309 · 2017: 347 · 2016: 309 · 2015: 324 · 2014: 297 · 2013: 250 · 2012: 222
FWCI
62.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
quality of care, quality assessment, definition of quality, patient contribution, health care system, health outcomes, process of care, quality standards
MeSH terms
Community Health Services, Delivery of Health Care, Medical Records, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations, Quality of Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review