The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Patients who leave a public hospital emergency department without being seen by a physician. Causes and consequences
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients who sought care at a public hospital emergency department and left without being seen by a physician needed immediate medical attention and whether they obtained care after leaving. DESIGN: Follow-up study of patients who left without being seen and of patients who waited to be seen by a physician. SETTING: A public hospital's emergency department in Torrance, Calif. PATIENTS: All patients who registered for care and left without being seen (n = 186) and a 20% random sample of patients who waited until they were seen (n = 211) in a 2-week period during spring 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At time of presentation: triage nurse urgency assessment, clinical acuity rating, and self-reported health status. At follow-up: hospitalization rates. RESULTS: Patients who left reported that they had waited 6.4 hours before leaving; those who stayed reported a 6.2-hour wait before being seen. There were no differences between those who left and those who stayed in chief complaint, triage nurse assessment, acuity ratings, or self-reported health status. Forty-six percent of those who left were judged to need immediate medical attention, and 29% needed care within 24 to 48 hours. Eleven percent of those who left were hospitalized within the next week, and three patients required emergency surgery. Nine percent of those who waited to be seen were hospitalized. Forty-nine percent of patients who left did not see a physician during the 1-week follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Overcrowding in this public hospital's emergency department restricts access to needed ambulatory medical care for the poor and uninsured.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Clinically Oriented Outcomes
Bernstein, S. L., Aronsky, D., Duseja, R., Epstein, S., Handel, D., Hwang, U., McCarthy, M., John McConnell, K., Pines, J. M., Rathlev, N., et al. (2009) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00295.x · Cited by 1,147
Access of Medicaid Recipients to Outpatient Care
(1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199405193302007 · Cited by 180
Public Emergency Room Overcrowding in the Era of Mass Imprisonment
Lara-Millán, A. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122414549552 · Cited by 165
Quality of Primary Care and Subsequent Pediatric Emergency Department Utilization
Brousseau, D. C., Hoffmann, R. G., Nattinger, A. B., Flores, G., Zhang, Y., & Gorelick, M. (2007) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-3518 · Cited by 145
An Emergency Department Patient Flow Model Based on Queueing Theory Principles
Wiler, J. L., Bolandifar, E., Griffey, R. T., Poirier, R. F., & Olsen, T. (2013) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.12215 · Cited by 69
Affiliation with a primary care provider in New Zealand: Who is, who isn’t
Jatrana, S., & Crampton, P. (2009) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.12.015 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, D. W.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1991-08-28
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1085-1090
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4230704398
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.