The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Risk of subsequent basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin among patients with prior skin cancer. Skin Cancer Prevention Study Group
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The primary aims of this study were to assess risk of subsequent basal and squamous cell skin cancer among patients with a prior history of these tumors and to examine these risks in relation to patient characteristics and life-style factors. DESIGN: Follow-up of participants in a randomized trial of betacarotene as a possible skin cancer preventive agent. SETTING: Clinical centers in Los Angeles, Calif, San Francisco, Calif, Minneapolis, Minn, and Hanover, NH. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 1805) who were diagnosed as having a basal or squamous cell skin cancer between January 1980 and February 1986 and were free of skin cancer at study entry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time from study entry to first new occurrence of basal and squamous cell skin cancer. RESULTS: The estimated risk of developing one or more new skin cancers was 35% at 3 years and 50% at 5 years. New skin cancers tended to be of the same cell type as the previous skin cancers. For both basal and squamous cell skin cancer, risk was higher among patients who were male, were over the age of 60 years, had more prior skin cancers, had severe actinic skin damage, or who burned easily with sun exposure. Compared with those who had never smoked, the rate of subsequent squamous cell skin cancer was higher among current smokers (rate ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 3.34) and former smokers (rate ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 2.47) and increased with both duration and amount smoked. There was no clear relationship between smoking and basal cell skin cancer; the rate appeared lower among heavy smokers but was unrelated to duration of smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with a prior nonmelanoma skin cancer had a substantial 5-year risk of developing another tumor of the same histologic type. Number of previous skin cancers, solar damage, and skin sensitivity to sun exposure were particularly related to this risk. The increased risk of squamous cell skin cancer associated with cigarette smoking merits further study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma
Telfer, N. R., Colver, G. B., & Morton, C. A. (2008) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08666.x · Cited by 960
Basal cell carcinomas: attack of the hedgehog
Epstein, E. H. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2503 · Cited by 834
Prevalence of a History of Skin Cancer in 2007: Results of an Incidence-Based Model
Stern, R. S. (2010) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.4 · Cited by 422
Prevention of non-melanoma skin cancer by targeting ultraviolet-B-light signalling
Bowden, G. T. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1253 · Cited by 391
Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma
Telfer, Colver, & Bowers (1999) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.03033.x · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Karagas, M. R.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1992-06-24
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3305-3310
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4249395580
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of subsequent basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin among patients with prior skin cancer. Skin Cancer Prevention Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.267.24.3305
- The paper
- Karagas, M. R. (1992). Risk of subsequent basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin among patients with prior skin cancer. Skin Cancer Prevention Study Group. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.267.24.3305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.