The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
The rational clinical examination
Abstract
To the Editor. —I was pleased to read your introduction to the new series on clinical examination. I thought the initial article 1 and Editorial 2 were both excellent. I would like to present the following case to pose a question: Four weeks ago, an 82-year-old woman came into my office with a 1-month history of right leg swelling. During this month, she had three separate episodes of pleuritic chest pain, the first two of which resolved spontaneously. She came to the office after the third episode of pain. On examination, she was found to have râles medial to her left scapula without audible rub. Her right leg was swollen and tender with a circumference of 40 cm compared with a left leg circumference of 35 cm. I felt absolutely certain that she had a deep-vein thrombosis with recurrent pulmonary emboli. I admitted her to the hospital where a venous
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Primary Care: Is There Enough Time for Prevention?
Yarnall, K. S. H., Pollak, K. I., Østbye, T., Krause, K. M., & Michener, J. L. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.4.635 · Cited by 1,641
Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia
Spasovski, G., Vanholder, R., Allolio, B., Annane, D., Ball, S., Bichet, D., Decaux, G., Fenske, W., Hoorn, E., Ichai, C., et al. (2014) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3210-2 · Cited by 1,020
Klein, S., Burke, L. E., Bray, G. A., Blair, S., Allison, D. B., Pi-Sunyer, X., Hong, Y., & Eckel, R. H. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000145546.97738.1e · Cited by 934
The Skin Prick Test—European Standards
Heinzerling, L., Mari, A., Bergmann, K., Bresciani, M., Burbach, G., Darsow, U., Durham, S., Fokkens, W., Gjomarkaj, M., Haahtela, T., et al. (2013) · Clinical and Translational Allergy · doi:10.1186/2045-7022-3-3 · Cited by 681
Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence
Leeflang, M. M. G., Rutjes, A. W. S., Reitsma, J. B., Hooft, L., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2013) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.121286 · Cited by 530
Metadata
- Authors
- Devitt, N. F.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1992-10-28
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2164c-2164
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021950490
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The rational clinical examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.268.16.2164c
- The paper
- Devitt, N. F. (1992). The rational clinical examination. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.268.16.2164c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.