Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 616

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

The rational clinical examination

Neal F. Devitt·1992·JAMA

Abstract

To the Editor. —I was pleased to read your introduction to the new series on clinical examination. I thought the initial article 1 and Editorial 2 were both excellent. I would like to present the following case to pose a question: Four weeks ago, an 82-year-old woman came into my office with a 1-month history of right leg swelling. During this month, she had three separate episodes of pleuritic chest pain, the first two of which resolved spontaneously. She came to the office after the third episode of pain. On examination, she was found to have râles medial to her left scapula without audible rub. Her right leg was swollen and tender with a circumference of 40 cm compared with a left leg circumference of 35 cm. I felt absolutely certain that she had a deep-vein thrombosis with recurrent pulmonary emboli. I admitted her to the hospital where a venous

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1001/jama.268.16.2164c

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 616

Metadata

Authors
Devitt, N. F.
Venue
JAMA
Publisher
American Medical Association
Published
1992-10-28
Volume
268
Issue
16
Pages
2164c-2164
ISSN
0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021950490
Cited by
616
References
0
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The rational clinical examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.268.16.2164c
The paper
Devitt, N. F. (1992). The rational clinical examination. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.268.16.2164c

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.