Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 843

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence

·1993·JAMA

Abstract

THE TERMimpotence, as it has been applied to the title of this conference, has traditionally been used to signify the inability of the male to attain and maintain erection of the penis sufficient to permit satisfactory sexual intercourse. However, this use has often led to confusing and uninterpretable results in clinical and basic science investigations. This, together with its pejorative implications, suggests that the more precise termerectile dysfunctionbe used instead to signify an inability of the male to achieve an erect penis as part of the overall multifaceted process of male sexual function. This process comprises a variety of physical aspects with important psychological and behavioral overtones. In an effort to be precise in the analysis of the material discussed at this conference, this consensus report addresses issues of male erectile dysfunction as implied by use of the termimpotencein the reports that have been presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1001/jama.270.1.83

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 843

Metadata

Venue
JAMA
Publisher
American Medical Association
Published
1993-07-07
Volume
270
Issue
1
Pages
83-90
ISSN
0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4230764065
Cited by
843
References
0
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.270.1.83
The paper
NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. (1993). JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.270.1.83

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.