Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ON FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION: DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS

BASSON, ROSEMARY, BERMAN, JENNIFER, BURNETT, ARTHUR, DEROGATIS, LEONARD, FERGUSON, DAVID, FOURCROY, JEAN, GOLDSTEIN, IRWIN, GRAZIOTTIN, ALESSANDRA, HEIMAN, JULIA, LAAN, ELLEN, LEIBLUM, SANDRA, PADMA-NATHAN, HARIN, ROSEN, RAYMOND, SEGRAVES, KATHLEEN, SEGRAVES, R. TAYLOR, SHABSIGH, RIDWAN, SIPSKI, MARCALEE, WAGNER, GORM, WHIPPLE, BEVERLY·2000·Journal of Urology
DOI 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67828-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE: Female sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent but not well defined or understood. We evaluated and revised existing definitions and classifications of female sexual dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An interdisciplinary consensus conference panel consisting of 19 experts in female sexual dysfunction selected from 5 countries was convened by the Sexual Function Health Council of the American Foundation for Urologic Disease. A modified Delphi method was used to develop consensus definitions and classifications, and build on the existing framework of the International Classification of Diseases-10 and DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders of the American Psychiatric Association, which were limited to consideration of psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: Classifications were expanded to include psychogenic and organic causes of desire, arousal, orgasm and sexual pain disorders. An essential element of the new diagnostic system is the "personal distress" criterion. In particular, new definitions of sexual arousal and hypoactive sexual desire disorders were developed, and a new category of noncoital sexual pain disorder was added. In addition, a new subtyping system for clinical diagnosis was devised. Guidelines for clinical end points and outcomes were proposed, and important research goals and priorities were identified. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend use of the new female sexual dysfunction diagnostic and classification system based on physiological as well as psychological pathophysiologies, and a personal distress criterion for most diagnostic categories.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67828-7

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 1,257

Metadata

Authors
BASSON, R., BERMAN, J., BURNETT, A., DEROGATIS, L., FERGUSON, D., FOURCROY, J., GOLDSTEIN, I., GRAZIOTTIN, A., HEIMAN, J., LAAN, E., LEIBLUM, S., PADMA-NATHAN, H., ROSEN, R., SEGRAVES, K., SEGRAVES, R. T., SHABSIGH, R., SIPSKI, M., WAGNER, G., & WHIPPLE, B.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2000-03
Volume
163
Issue
3
Pages
888-893
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
DOI
10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67828-7
OpenAlex
W2069897728
Cited by
1,257
References
17
FWCI
34.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ON FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION: DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67828-7
The paper
BASSON, R., BERMAN, J., BURNETT, A., DEROGATIS, L., FERGUSON, D., FOURCROY, J., GOLDSTEIN, I., GRAZIOTTIN, A., HEIMAN, J., LAAN, E., LEIBLUM, S., PADMA-NATHAN, H., ROSEN, R., SEGRAVES, K., SEGRAVES, R. T., SHABSIGH, R., SIPSKI, M., WAGNER, G., & WHIPPLE, B. (2000). REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ON FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION: DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67828-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.