Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 608

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of prophylactic antiarrhythmic drug therapy in acute myocardial infarction. An overview of results from randomized controlled trials

K.K. Teo·1993·JAMA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of prophylactic therapy with antiarrhythmic agents on mortality in patients with myocardial infarction. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Data were obtained from all completed, published or unpublished, randomized, parallel controlled trials of antiarrhythmic agents, regardless of sample size. Investigators were contacted for data on patients excluded after randomization. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on mortality were extracted by one author and confirmed where necessary by the others. DATA SYNTHESIS: Mortality data from 138 trials on 98,000 patients were combined by the Yusuf-Peto adaptation of the Mantel-Haenszel method. There were 660 deaths among 11,712 patients allocated to receive class I agents and 571 deaths among 11,517 corresponding control patients (51 trials: odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.28; P = .03). Of 26,973 patients allocated to receive beta-blockers (class II agents), 1464 died compared with 1727 deaths among 26,295 control patients (55 trials: OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.87; P = .00001). Of 778 patients allocated to receive amiodarone (a class III agent), 77 died compared with 101 deaths in 779 control patients (eight trials: OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.97; P = .03). There were 982 deaths in 10,154 patients allocated to receive a class IV agent (calcium channel blockers) and 949 deaths in 10,188 control patients (24 trials: OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.14; P = .41). CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of class I antiarrhythmic agents after myocardial infarction is associated with increased mortality. beta-Blockers have been conclusively demonstrated to reduce mortality. The limited data on amiodarone appear promising. Data on calcium channel blockers remain unpromising.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1001/jama.270.13.1589

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 608

Metadata

Authors
Teo, K. K.
Venue
JAMA
Publisher
American Medical Association
Published
1993-10-06
Volume
270
Issue
13
Pages
1589-1595
ISSN
0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4243836195
Cited by
608
References
1
FWCI
18.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of prophylactic antiarrhythmic drug therapy in acute myocardial infarction. An overview of results from randomized controlled trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.270.13.1589
The paper
Teo, K. K. (1993). Effects of prophylactic antiarrhythmic drug therapy in acute myocardial infarction. An overview of results from randomized controlled trials. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.270.13.1589

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.