Pulse: THE MEDICAL STUDENT SECTION OF JAMA
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Meaningful learning occurs when connections are made between new and existing information.
“Proponents of the transformative learning approach consider that meaningful learning occurs when connections are made between new and existing information (Regan-Smith et al. 1994).”
From Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83 (2013) · cites this paper as Regan-Smith et al. 1994
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Taylor, D. C. M., & Hamdy, H. (2013) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2013.828153 · Cited by 1,176 · see citing works
- Authors
- Regan-Smith, M. G.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Martha G. Regan-Smith
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1994-11-02
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1377
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1978583305
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
- Keywords
- rote learning, medical education, memorization, medical students
- MeSH terms
- Curriculum, Education, Medical, Humans, Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
