The DOI matches its Crossref record.
National Estimates of Nonfatal Firearm-Related Injuries: Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the magnitude and characteristics of nonfatal firearm-related injuries treated in hospital emergency departments in the United States and to compare nonfatal injury rates with firearm-related fatality rates. DESIGN: Data were obtained from medical records for all firearm-related injury cases identified using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) from June 1, 1992, through May 31, 1993. SETTING: NEISS comprises 91 hospitals that are a stratified probability sample of all hospitals in the United States and its territories that have at least six beds and provide 24-hour emergency service. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers and population rates for nonfatal and fatal firearm-related injuries. RESULTS: An estimated 99,025 (95% confidence interval [CI], 56,325 to 141,725) persons (or 38.6 per 100,000 population; 95% CI, 22.0 to 55.2) were treated for nonfatal firearm-related injuries in US hospital emergency departments during the study period. The rate of nonfatal firearm-related injuries treated was 2.6 (95% CI, 1.5 to 3.7) times the national rate of fatal firearm-related injuries for 1992. CONCLUSIONS: Nonfatal firearm-related injuries contribute substantially to the overall public health burden of firearm-related injuries. NEISS can be useful to monitor the number of nonfatal firearm-related injuries in the United States. A national surveillance system is needed to provide uniform data on firearm-related injury morbidity and mortality for…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However two studies have demonstrated over 90% accuracy [26, 27].”
From The demographics of dog bites in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Firearm-Related Injuries Affecting the Pediatric Population
COUNCIL ON INJURY, V., Dowd, M. D., Sege, R. D., Gardner, H. G., Quinlan, K. P., Ewald, M. B., Ebel, B. E., Lichenstein, R., Melzer-Lange, M. D., O’Neil, J., et al. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2481 · Cited by 327
Epidemiologic trends in fatal and nonfatal firearm injuries in the US, 2009-2017.
Kaufman, E. J., Wiebe, D. J., Xiong, R. A., Morrison, C. N., Seamon, M. J., & Delgado, M. K. (2021) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6696 · Cited by 285
Grossman, D. C., Reay, D. T., & Baker, S. A. (1999) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.153.8.875 · Cited by 182
The Medical Costs of Gunshot Injuries in the United States
Cook, P. J. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.5.447 · Cited by 151
The demographics of dog bites in the United States
Loder, R. T. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01360 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Annest, J. L.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-06-14
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 1749
- ISSN
- 0098-7484
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review