The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinically recognized dysplastic nevi. A central risk factor for cutaneous melanoma
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of number and type of nevi to the development of melanoma. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Outpatient clinics in referral hospitals. PATIENTS: Cases were 716 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed melanoma identified at 2 melanoma centers between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 1992. Stratified random sampling of patients from outpatient clinics was used to identify 1014 participating controls of the same age, sex, race, and geographic distribution as the melanoma cases. All study subjects underwent an interview, a complete skin examination, photography of the most atypical nevi, and, if the patient was willing, a biopsy of the most atypical nevus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number and type of nevi on the entire body were systematically reported. All diagnoses of clinically dysplastic nevi were confirmed by expert examiners. RESULTS: Risk for melanoma was strongly related to number of small nevi, large nondysplastic nevi, and clinically dysplastic nevi. In the absence of dysplastic nevi, increased numbers of small nevi were associated with an approximately 2-fold risk, and increased numbers of both small and large nondysplastic nevi were associated with a 4-fold risk. One clinically dysplastic nevus was associated with a 2-fold risk (95% confidence interval, 1.4-3.6), while 10 or more conferred a 12-fold increased risk (95% confidence interval, 4.4-31). Congenital nevi were not associated with increased risk of melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: Although nondysplastic nevi confer a small risk, clinically dysplastic nevi confer substantial risk for melanoma. On the basis of nevus number and type, clinicians can identify a population at high risk of this epidemic cancer for screening and intervention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer
Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81333-1 · Cited by 4,919
Cited by
Gandini, S., Sera, F., Cattaruzza, M. S., Pasquini, P., Zanetti, R., Masini, C., Boyle, P., & Melchi, C. F. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.034 · Cited by 787
A prospective study of pigmentation, sun exposure, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in women
Veierod, M. B., Weiderpass, E., Thorn, M., Hansson, J., Lund, E., Armstrong, B., & Adami, H.-O. (2003) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djg075 · Cited by 333
Ultraviolet radiation and the skin: Photobiology and sunscreen photoprotection
Young, A. R., Claveau, J., & Rossi, A. B. (2017) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.09.038 · Cited by 339
Diet and Melanoma in a Case-Control Study
Millen, A. E., Tucker, M. A., Hartge, P., Halpern, A., Elder, D. E., Guerry, D., Holly, E. A., Sagebiel, R. W., & Potischman, N. (2004) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.1042.13.6 · Cited by 172
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tucker, M. A.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1997-05-14
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1439-1444
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4242231501
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinically recognized dysplastic nevi. A central risk factor for cutaneous melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.277.18.1439
- The paper
- Tucker, M. A. (1997). Clinically recognized dysplastic nevi. A central risk factor for cutaneous melanoma. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.277.18.1439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.