Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning, Satisfaction, and Mistreatment During Medical Internship: A National Survey of Working Conditions

Daugherty, Steven R., Baldwin, Jr, DeWitt C., Rowley, Beverley D.·1998·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Concerns about the working and learning environment of residency training continue to surface. Previous surveys of residents have focused on work hours and income, but have shed little light on how residents view their training experience. OBJECTIVE: To provide a description of the internship year as seen by a large cross section of second-year residents. DESIGN: Mail survey conducted in 1991. SETTING: Residency programs in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Random 10% sample (N=1773) of all second-year residents listed in the American Medical Association's medical research and information database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: What and who contributes most to residents' learning during internships, degree of satisfaction with the internship experience, on-call and sleep schedules, incidents of perceived mistreatment or abuse, observations of unethical behavior, and experiences of harassment or discrimination. RESULTS: A total of 1277 surveys (72%) of 1773 mailed were returned. Overall, respondents reported a moderate level of satisfaction with their first year of residency. On a scale of 0 to 3, residents rated other residents as contributing most (score of 2.3) to their learning, with special patients ranked second (2.1). During a typical work week, residents reported that they spent an average of 56.9 hours on call in the hospital. A total of 1185 (93%) residents reported experiencing at least 1 incident of perceived mistreatment, with 53% reporting being belittled or humiliated by more senior residents. Among women residents, 63% reported having experienced at least 1 episode of sexual harassment or discrimination. A total of 45% of residents reported having observed another individual falsifying medical records, and 70% saw a colleague working in an impaired condition, most often lack of sleep. Regression analyses suggest that satisfaction with the residency experience was associated with the presence of factors that enhanced learning, and fewer experiences of perceived mistreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Residents report significant problems during their internship experience. Satisfaction with internship is enhanced by positive learning experiences and lack of mistreatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.279.15.1194

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Daugherty, S. R., Baldwin, Jr., & Rowley, B. D.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1998-04-15
Volume
279
Issue
15
Pages
1194
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2120120184
Cited by
313
References
20
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning, Satisfaction, and Mistreatment During Medical Internship: A National Survey of Working Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.279.15.1194
The paper
Daugherty, S. R., Baldwin, Jr., & Rowley, B. D. (1998). Learning, Satisfaction, and Mistreatment During Medical Internship: A National Survey of Working Conditions. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.15.1194

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.