The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Hospital Volume on Operative Mortality for Major Cancer Surgery
Abstract
CONTEXT: Hospitals that treat a relatively high volume of patients for selected surgical oncology procedures report lower surgical in-hospital mortality rates than hospitals with a low volume of the procedures, but the reports do not take into account length of stay or adjust for case mix. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospital volume was inversely associated with 30-day operative mortality, after adjusting for case mix. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database in which the hypothesis was prospectively specified. Surgeons determined in advance the surgical oncology procedures for which the experience of treating a larger volume of patients was most likely to lead to the knowledge or technical expertise that might offset surgical fatalities. PATIENTS: All 5013 patients in the SEER registry aged 65 years or older at cancer diagnosis who underwent pancreatectomy, esophagectomy, pneumonectomy, liver resection, or pelvic exenteration, using incident cancers of the pancreas, esophagus, lung, colon, and rectum, and various genitourinary cancers diagnosed between 1984 and 1993. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Thirty-day mortality in relation to procedure volume, adjusted for comorbidity, patient age, and cancer stage. RESULTS: Higher volume was linked with lower mortality for pancreatectomy (P=.004), esophagectomy (P<.001), liver resection (P=.04), and pelvic exenteration (P=.04), but not for pneumonectomy (P=.32). The most striking results were for esophagectomy, for which the operative mortality rose to 17.3% in low-volume hospitals, compared with 3.4% in high-volume hospitals, and for pancreatectomy, for which the corresponding rates were 12.9% vs 5.8%. Adjustments for case mix and other patient factors did not change the finding that low volume was strongly associated with excess mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that when complex surgical oncologic procedures are provided by surgical teams in hospitals with specialty expertise, mortality rates are lower.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Romano, P. S., Roos, L. L., & Jollis, J. G. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90103-8 · Cited by 1,717
Cited by
Kamisawa, T., Wood, L. D., Itoi, T., & Takaori, K. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00141-0 · Cited by 2,212
Halm, E. A., Lee, C., & Chassin, M. R. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-6-200209170-00012 · Cited by 1,704
Gouma, D. J., van Geenen, R. C. I., van Gulik, T. M., de Haan, R. J., de Wit, L. T., Busch, O. R. C., & Obertop, H. (2000) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200012000-00007 · Cited by 836
One Thousand Fifty-Six Hepatectomies Without Mortality in 8 Years
Imamura, H. (2003) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1198 · Cited by 835
Overholt, B. F., Lightdale, C. J., Wang, K. K., Canto, M. I., Burdick, S., Haggitt, R. C., Bronner, M. P., Taylor, S. L., Grace, M. G. A., & Depot, M. (2005) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.047 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Begg, C. B.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-11-25
- Volume
- 280
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1747
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2062542884
- Cited by
- 1,657
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 113.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Hospital Volume on Operative Mortality for Major Cancer Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.280.20.1747
- The paper
- Begg, C. B. (1998). Impact of Hospital Volume on Operative Mortality for Major Cancer Surgery. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.20.1747
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.