Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 836

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rates of Complications and Death After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk Factors and the Impact of Hospital Volume

Open access
Gouma, Dirk J., van Geenen, Rutger C. I., van Gulik, Thomas M., de Haan, Rob J., de Wit, Laurens T., Busch, Olivier R. C., Obertop, Huug·2000·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a two-part study of pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Netherlands, focusing on the effects of risk factors on outcomes in a single high-volume hospital and the effect of hospital volume on outcomes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Hospital volume and surgeon caseload can be related to the rates of complications and death, and the influence of risk factors can be volume-dependent. Provision of regionalized care should take this into account. METHODS: In part A, a single-institution database on 300 consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy was divided into two periods with similar numbers of patients. Overall complications, deaths, hospital stay, and risk factors were analyzed in the two periods and compared with an historical reference group. In part B, Netherlands medical registry data on age and postoperative death of patients who underwent partial pancreaticoduodenectomy from 1994 to 1998 were analyzed for the influence of hospital volume on death. RESULTS: Between the time periods, the institutional death rate decreased from 4.9% to 0.7%, the complication rate from 60% to 41%. Median hospital stay decreased from 24 to 15 days. The death rate was not related to patient age and did not differ between surgeons. Serum creatinine levels, need for blood transfusion, and period of resection were independent risk factors for complications. The death rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Netherlands was 12.6% in 1994 and 10.1% in 1998; it was greater in patients older than age 65. During the 5-year period, 40% of the procedures were performed in hospitals performing fewer than five resections per year, and the death rate was greater than in hospitals performing more than 25 resections per year. CONCLUSIONS: The overall death rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy did not decrease significantly during the period, and it was greater in low-volume hospitals and older patients. The lower death and complication rates in high-volume hospitals, including the single-center outcomes, were similar to those reported in other countries and may be due to better prevention and management of complications. Pancreaticoduodenectomy should be performed in centers with sufficient experience and resources for support.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000658-200012000-00007

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 836

Metadata

Authors
Gouma, D. J., van Geenen, R. C. I., van Gulik, T. M., de Haan, R. J., de Wit, L. T., Busch, O. R. C., & Obertop, H.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2000-12
Volume
232
Issue
6
Pages
786-795
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116139289
Cited by
836
References
15
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rates of Complications and Death After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk Factors and the Impact of Hospital Volume. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-200012000-00007
The paper
Gouma, D. J., van Geenen, R. C. I., van Gulik, T. M., de Haan, R. J., de Wit, L. T., Busch, O. R. C., & Obertop, H. (2000). Rates of Complications and Death After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk Factors and the Impact of Hospital Volume. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200012000-00007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.