Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 534

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Total Parenteral Nutrition in the Critically Ill Patient: A Meta-analysis

Heyland, Daren K., MacDonald, Shaun, Keefe, Laurie, Drover, John W.·1998·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Nutritional support has become a standard of care for hospitalized patients, but whether total parenteral nutrition (TPN) affects morbidity and mortality is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between TPN and complication and mortality rates in critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES: Computerized search of published research on MEDLINE from 1980 to 1998, personal files, and review of relevant reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: We reviewed 210 titles, abstracts, and papers. Primary studies were included if they were randomized clinical trials of critically ill or surgical patients that evaluated the effect of TPN (compared with standard care) on complication and mortality rates. We excluded studies comparing TPN with enteral nutrition. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant data were abstracted on the methodology and outcomes of primary studies. Data were abstracted in duplicate, independently. DATA SYNTHESIS: There were 26 randomized trials of 2211 patients comparing the use of TPN with standard care (usual oral diet plus intravenous dextrose) in surgical and critically ill patients. When the results of these trials were aggregated, TPN had no effect on mortality (risk ratio [RR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.31). Patients who received TPN tended to have a lower complication rate, but this result was not statistically significant (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.64-1.09). We examined several a priori hypotheses and found that studies including only malnourished patients were associated with lower complication rates but no difference in mortality when compared with studies of nonmalnourished patients. Studies published since 1989 and studies with a higher methods score showed no treatment effect, while studies published in 1988 or before and studies with a lower methods score demonstrated a significant treatment effect. Complication rates were lower in studies that did not use lipids; however, there was no difference in mortality rates between studies that did not use lipids and those studies that did. Studies limited to critically ill patients demonstrated a significant increase in complication and mortality rates compared with studies of surgical patients. CONCLUSIONS: Total parenteral nutrition does not influence the overall mortality rate of surgical or critically ill patients. It may reduce the complication rate, especially in malnourished patients, but study results are influenced by patient population, use of lipids, methodological quality, and year of publication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.280.23.2013

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 534

Metadata

Authors
Heyland, D. K., MacDonald, S., Keefe, L., & Drover, J. W.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1998-12-16
Volume
280
Issue
23
Pages
2013
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2003715530
Cited by
534
References
2
FWCI
26.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Total Parenteral Nutrition in the Critically Ill Patient: A Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.280.23.2013
The paper
Heyland, D. K., MacDonald, S., Keefe, L., & Drover, J. W. (1998). Total Parenteral Nutrition in the Critically Ill Patient: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.23.2013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.