Cited by 1,873Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.)

Open access
McClave, Stephen A., Martindale, Robert G., Vanek, Vincent W., McCarthy, Mary, Roberts, Pamela, Taylor, Beth, Ochoa, Juan B., Napolitano, Lena +3 more·2009·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

SCCM) in Critical Care Medicine, 2009; volume 37, number 5. literature were resolved by consensus of opinion of the committee members, which in some cases led to a downgrade of the recommendation.Following an extensive review process by external reviewers, the final guideline manuscript was reviewed and approved by A.S.P.E.N.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0148607109335234

Cites

304 of 304 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ASPEN standards for critically ill adults call for adjusting both protein and energy level for obese patients.

    “The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) standards for critically ill adults call for adjusting both protein and energy level for obese patients.70”
  • During the COVID-19 pandemic, several hospitals implemented emergency use of newer factory-calibrated continuous glucose monitoring devices not requiring capillary glucose calibration for ICU and non-ICU medical and surgical patients.

    “Several hospitals implemented emergency use, particularly of newer factory-calibrated CGM not requiring capillary glucose calibrations, for persons in ICU and non-ICU medical and surgical settings.1266,1389,1390,1396,1397”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1389]

    The glucose-control rationale discusses serum glucose targets in ICU patients, and the Target Patient Population section defines the scope of the nutrition guidelines. Neither addresses hospitals’ emergency use of factory-calibrated continuous glucose monitors during COVID-19; searches for those devices, calibration, and emergency use found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Current hospital monitoring methods often miss most hypoglycemic episodes, especially asymptomatic or nocturnal ones, which may be the most dangerous.

    “Hence, current methods for monitoring hypoglycemia in hospitals often fail to detect most hypoglycemic episodes, particularly asymptomatic or nocturnal hypoglycemia, which may be the most dangerous episodes.1389”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1389]

    The G4 rationale discusses hypoglycemia risk and mortality in relation to glucose-control targets, but does not address whether hospital monitoring misses episodes. Searches for asymptomatic or nocturnal hypoglycemia and for monitoring or detection found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [58]58. Louie BE, Noseworthy T, Hailey D, Gramlich LM, Jacobs P, Warnock GL. Enteral or parenteral nutrition for severe pancreati- tis: a randomized controlled trial and health technology assess- ment. Can J Surg. 2005;48:298-306.
  2. [61]61. Casas M, Mora J, Fort E, et al. Total enteral nutrition vs. total parenteral nutrition in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2007;99:264-269.
  3. [106]106. Simms JM, Oliver E, Smith JAR. A study of total parenteral nutri- tion (TPN) in major gastric and esophageal resection for neoplasia. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1980;4:422.
  4. [109]109. Jensen S. Parenteral nutrition and cancer surgery [abstract]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1982;6:335. Abstract 112.
  5. [110]110. Moghissi M, Teasdale P, Dench M. Comparison between preopera- tive enteral (naso-gastric tube) and parenteral feeding in patients with cancer of the oesophagus undergoing surgery [abstract]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1982;6:335. Abstract 111.
  6. [117]117. Fan ST, Lau WY, Wong KK. Preoperative parenteral nutrition in patients with oesophageal cancer: a prospective randomized clini- cal trial. Clin Nutr. 1989;8:23-27.
  7. [125]125. Jiménez FJ, Leyba CO, Jiménez LM, Valdecasas MS, Montero JG. Study of hypocaloric peripheral parenteral nutrition in postopera- tive patients. Clin Nutr. 1995;14:88-96.
  8. [131]131. Klein S, Kinney J, Jeejeebhoy K, et al. Nutrition support in clinical practice: review of published data and recommendations for future research directions. National Institutes of Health, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, and American Society for Clinical Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997;21:133-156.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McClave, S. A., Martindale, R. G., Vanek, V. W., McCarthy, M., Roberts, P., Taylor, B., Ochoa, J. B., Napolitano, L., Cresci, G., the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors, & the American College of Critical Care Medicine
Affiliations
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Madigan Army Medical Center (US)
  • Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US)
  • Brooklyn Hospital Center (US)
Corresponding author
McClave, Stephen A.
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-27
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
277-316
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W2795413644
Cited by
1,873
References
304
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 144 · 2015: 275 · 2014: 246 · 2013: 154 · 2012: 156
FWCI
131.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
nutrition support therapy, critically ill adults, enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, nutritional assessment, critical care nutrition
MeSH terms
Adult, Critical Care, Enteral Nutrition, Governing Board, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Parenteral Nutrition, Societies, Medical, United States, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Critical Illness, Health Care Costs, Nutritional Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review