The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minority Faculty and Academic Rank in Medicine
Abstract
CONTEXT: Previous studies have found that fewer minority medical school faculty hold senior professorial ranks than do majority faculty and may not be promoted as rapidly. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether minority faculty were as likely as majority faculty to have attained senior rank (associate professor or full professor) after adjusting for other factors that typically influence promotion. DESIGN: A self-administered mailed survey of US medical school faculty using the Association of American Medical Colleges database. The sample was stratified by department, graduation cohort, and sex. PARTICIPANTS: A stratified random sample of 3013 full-time faculty at 24 representative US medical schools. All underrepresented minority faculty at these schools were sampled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Attainment of senior academic rank (associate professor or full professor). RESULTS: Of 3013 faculty surveyed, 1807 (60.0%) responded, including 1463 white (81.0%), 154 black (8.5%), 136 Asian (7.5%), and 54 Hispanic (3.0%). Overall, 980 faculty (54%) had attained senior academic rank, including 47 (30.5%) of 154 black faculty, 59 (43.4%) of 136 Asian faculty, 22 (40.8%) of 54 Hispanic faculty, and 852 (58.3%) of 1463 white faculty. White faculty had significantly more first-authored and total peer-reviewed publications than the other groups. After adjusting for the medical school, department, years as medical school faculty, number of peer-reviewed publications, receipt of research grant funding, proportion of time in clinical activities, sex, and tenure status, we found that the odds ratios of holding senior rank relative to white faculty were 0.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.63) for black faculty, 0.36 (95% CI, 0.12-1.08) for Hispanic faculty, and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.30-1.12) for Asian faculty. CONCLUSIONS: Minority faculty were less likely than white faculty to hold senior academic rank. This finding was not explained by potential confounders such as years as a faculty member or measures of academic productivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199 · Cited by 1,486
Cited by
Addressing disparities in academic medicine: what of the minority tax?
Rodríguez, J. E., Campbell, K. M., & Pololi, L. H. (2015) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0290-9 · Cited by 739
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Faculty Promotion in Academic Medicine
Fang, D. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.9.1085 · Cited by 381
Price, E. G., Gozu, A., Kern, D. E., Powe, N. R., Wand, G. S., Golden, S., & Cooper, L. A. (2005) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0127.x · Cited by 273
Barriers to Optimum End‐of‐life Care for Minority Patients
Krakauer, E. L., Crenner, C., & Fox, K. (2002) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50027.x · Cited by 255
Minority Faculty Voices on Diversity in Academic Medicine: Perspectives From One School
Mahoney, M. R., Wilson, E., Odom, K. L., Flowers, L., & Adler, S. R. (2008) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31817ec002 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Palepu, A.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-09-02
- Volume
- 280
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 767
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2022742708
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minority Faculty and Academic Rank in Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.280.9.767
- The paper
- Palepu, A. (1998). Minority Faculty and Academic Rank in Medicine. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.9.767
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.