The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Legal Issues Concerning Electronic Health Information: Privacy, Quality, and Liability
Abstract
Personally identifiable health information about individuals and general medical information is increasingly available in electronic form in health databases and through online networks. The proliferation of electronic data within the modern health information infrastructure presents significant benefits for medical providers and patients, including enhanced patient autonomy, improved clinical treatment, advances in health research and public health surveillance, and modern security techniques. However, it also presents new legal challenges in 3 interconnected areas: privacy of identifiable health information, reliability and quality of health data, and tortbased liability. Protecting health information privacy (by giving individuals control over health data without severely restricting warranted communal uses) directly improves the quality and reliability of health data (by encouraging individual uses of health services and communal uses of data), which diminishes tort-based liabilities (by reducing instances of medical malpractice or privacy invasions through improvements in the delivery of health care services resulting in part from better quality and reliability of clinical and research data). Following an analysis of the interconnectivity of these 3 areas and discussing existing and proposed health information privacy laws, recommendations for legal reform concerning health information privacy are presented. These include (1) recognizing identifiable health information as highly sensitive, (2) providing privacy safeguards based on fair information practices, (3) empowering patients with information and rights to consent to disclosure (4) limiting disclosures of health data absent consent, (5) incorporating industry-wide security protections, (6) establishing a national data protection authority, and (7) providing a national minimal level of privacy protections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bates, D. W. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.15.1311 · Cited by 2,107
Cited by
Information security and privacy in healthcare: current state of research
Appari, A., & Johnson, M. E. (2010) · International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management · doi:10.1504/ijiem.2010.035624 · Cited by 406
Generating Multi-label Discrete Patient Records using Generative Adversarial Networks
Choi, E., Biswal, S., Malin, B., Duke, J. D., Stewart, W. F., & Sun, J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06490 · Cited by 341
The quality of health information on the internet
Purcell, G. P. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7337.557 · Cited by 249
Randomized Controlled Trial of Internet-Based Stress Management
Zetterqvist, K., Maanmies, J., Ström, L., & Andersson, G. (2003) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506070302316 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodge, Jr., Gostin, L. O., & Jacobson, P. D.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-10-20
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1466
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2069351201
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 51.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Legal Issues Concerning Electronic Health Information: Privacy, Quality, and Liability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.282.15.1466
- The paper
- Hodge, Jr., Gostin, L. O., & Jacobson, P. D. (1999). Legal Issues Concerning Electronic Health Information: Privacy, Quality, and Liability. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.15.1466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.