Cited by 2,107Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsElectronic Health Records SystemsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors

Bates, David W.·1998·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a significant and costly cause of injury during hospitalization. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of 2 interventions for preventing nonintercepted serious medication errors, defined as those that either resulted in or had potential to result in an ADE and were not intercepted before reaching the patient. DESIGN: Before-after comparison between phase 1 (baseline) and phase 2 (after intervention was implemented) and, within phase 2, a randomized comparison between physician computer order entry (POE) and the combination of POE plus a team intervention. SETTING: Large tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: For the comparison of phase 1 and 2, all patients admitted to a stratified random sample of 6 medical and surgical units in a tertiary care hospital over a 6-month period, and for the randomized comparison during phase 2, all patients admitted to the same units and 2 randomly selected additional units over a subsequent 9-month period. INTERVENTIONS: A physician computer order entry system (POE) for all units and a team-based intervention that included changing the role of pharmacists, implemented for half the units. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Nonintercepted serious medication errors. RESULTS: Comparing identical units between phases 1 and 2, nonintercepted serious medication errors decreased 55%, from 10.7 events per 1000 patient-days to 4.86 events per 1000 (P=.01). The decline occurred for all stages of the medication-use process. Preventable ADEs declined 17% from 4.69 to 3.88 (P=.37), while nonintercepted potential ADEs declined 84% from 5.99 to 0.98 per 1000 patient-days (P=.002). When POE-only was compared with the POE plus team intervention combined, the team intervention conferred no additional benefit over POE. CONCLUSIONS: Physician computer order entry decreased the rate of nonintercepted serious medication errors by more than half, although this decrease was larger for potential ADEs than for errors that actually resulted in an ADE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.280.15.1311

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bates, D. W.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Bates, David W.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1998-10-21
Volume
280
Issue
15
Pages
1311
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2095818009
Cited by
2,107
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 100
FWCI
101.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
computerized physician order entry, medication errors, adverse drug reactions, team-based intervention, pharmacist role, drug safety, inpatient care, medication process, error prevention
MeSH terms
Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Medication Errors, Pharmacies, Physician's Role, Drug Prescriptions, Random Allocation, Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review