Relationship Between Low Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Mortality in Normal-Weight, Overweight, and Obese Men
Abstract
CONTEXT: Recent guidelines for treatment of overweight and obesity include recommendations for risk stratification by disease conditions and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, but the role of physical inactivity is not prominent in these recommendations. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the influence of low cardiorespiratory fitness, an objective marker of physical inactivity, on CVD and all-cause mortality in normal-weight, overweight, and obese men and compare low fitness with other mortality predictors. DESIGN: Prospective observational data from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. SETTING: Preventive medicine clinic in Dallas, Tex. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 25714 adult men (average age, 43.8 years [SD, 10.1 years]) who received a medical examination during 1970 to 1993, with mortality follow-up to December 31, 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality based on mortality predictors (baseline CVD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, high serum cholesterol level, hypertension, current cigarette smoking, and low cardiorespiratory fitness) stratified by body mass index. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 1025 deaths (439 due to CVD) during 258781 man-years of follow-up. Overweight and obese men with baseline CVD or CVD risk factors were at higher risk for all-cause and CVD mortality compared with normal-weight men without these predictors. Using normal-weight men without CVD as the referent, the strongest predictor of CVD death in obese men was baseline CVD (age- and examination year-adjusted relative risk [RR], 14.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.4-20.8); RRs for obese men with diabetes mellitus, high cholesterol, hypertension, smoking, and low fitness were similar and ranged from 4.4 (95% CI, 2.7-7.1) for smoking to 5.0 (95% CI, 3.6-7.0) for low fitness. Relative risks for all-cause mortality in obese men ranged from 2.3 (95% CI, 1.7-2.9) for men with hypertension to 4.7 (95% CI, 3.6-6.1) for those with CVD at baseline. Relative risk for all-cause mortality in obese men with low fitness was 3.1 (95% CI, 2.5-3.8) and in obese men with diabetes mellitus 3.1 (95% CI, 2.3-4.2) and as slightly higher than the RRs for obese men who smoked or had high cholesterol levels. Low fitness was an independent predictor of mortality in all body mass index groups after adjustment for other mortality predictors. Approximately 50% (n = 1674) of obese men had low fitness, which led to a population-attributable risk of 39% for CVD mortality and 44% for all-cause mortality. Baseline CVD had population attributable risks of 51% and 27% for CVD and all-cause mortality, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, low cardiorespiratory fitness was a strong and independent predictor of CVD and all-cause mortality and of comparable importance with that of diabetes mellitus and other CVD risk factors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A high aerobic capacity is associated with a lower risk of cardiometabolic disease.
“a high aerobic capacity is associated with a lower risk of cardiometabolic disease (Church et al. 2005;Wei et al. 1999).”
From Towards the minimal amount of exercise for improving metabolic health: beneficial effects of reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training (2012) · cites this paper as Wei et al. 1999
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 1,168
- Authors
- Wei, M.
- Affiliations
- Cooper Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wei, Ming
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-10-27
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1547
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2055350029
- Cited by
- 1,168
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG06945)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- cardiorespiratory fitness, physical inactivity, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, obesity, overweight, body mass index, men, Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study, cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension, smoking, type 2 diabetes, serum cholesterol, risk stratification, mortality prediction, weight loss, weight gain, body composition
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases, Exercise Test, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Obesity, Physical Fitness, Risk, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review