Cited by 9Urinary Tract Infections ManagementAntibiotic Use and ResistancePediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies

Comparison of Ciprofloxacin (7 Days) and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (14 Days) for Acute Uncomplicated Pyelonephritis in Women: A Randomized Trial

Talan, David A., Stamm, Walter E., Hooton, Thomas M., Moran, Gregory J., Burke, Thomas, Iravani, Abdollah, Reuning-Scherer, Jonathan, Church, Deborah A.·2000·JAMA

Abstract

Context The optimal antimicrobial regimen and treatment duration for acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis are unknown. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of a 7-day ciprofloxacin regimen and a 14-day trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole regimen for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis in women. Design Randomized, double-blind comparative trial conducted from October 1994 through January 1997. Setting Twenty-five outpatient centers in the United States. Patients Of 378 enrolled premenopausal women aged at least 18 years with clinical diagnosis of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis, 255 were included in the analysis. Other individuals were excluded for no baseline causative organism, inadequate receipt of study drug, loss to follow-up, no appropriate cultures, and other reasons. Interventions Patients were randomized to oral ciprofloxacin, 500 mg twice per day for 7 days (with or without an initial 400-mg intravenous dose) followed by placebo for 7 days (n = 128 included in analysis) vs trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 160/800 mg twice per day for 14 days (with or without intravenous ceftriaxone, 1 g) (n = 127 included in the analysis). Main outcome measure Continued bacteriologic and clinical cure, such that alternative antimicrobial drugs were not required, among evaluable patients through the 4- to 11-day posttherapy visit, compared by treatment group. Results At 4 to 11 days posttherapy, bacteriologic cure rates were 99% (112 of 113) for the ciprofloxacin regimen and 89% (9…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.283.12.1583

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Talan, D. A., Stamm, W. E., Hooton, T. M., Moran, G. J., Burke, T., Iravani, A., Reuning-Scherer, J., & Church, D. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2000-03-22
Volume
283
Issue
12
Pages
1583
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W323663997
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JAMA (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Henry M. Jackson Foundation
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Ohio State University
  • George Washington University
  • University of Minnesota
  • Bayer Corporation
  • University of Washington
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • Bayer Canada
  • Madigan Army Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Keywords
ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis, women, antibiotic duration, fluoroquinolones, antibiotic comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review