Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 587

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impaired Cerebral Vasoreactivity and Risk of Stroke in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

Silvestrini, Mauro·2000·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Standards for treating patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis have been difficult to establish because of the lack of evidence for factors influencing these patients' prognoses. However, preliminary evidence suggests that an alteration in cerebral hemodynamic function may play a relevant role in the occurrence of stroke in patients with carotid artery disease. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between cerebrovascular reactivity to hypercapnia and cerebrovascular events in patients with severe unilateral asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, blinded longitudinal study conducted in an outpatient neurovascular department in Italy between June 1996 and April 1998, with a median follow-up of 28.5 months. PATIENTS: Ninety-four patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis of at least 70% (74 men; mean age, 71 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subsequent occurrence of cerebral ischemic events (transient ischemic attack or stroke) or death, analyzed by cerebrovascular reactivity to hypercapnia (measured by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography and calculated by the breath-holding index values in the middle cerebral arteries). RESULTS: The overall annual rate for all ischemic events was 7.9%. Seventeen patients (18%) had ischemic events, all but 1 of which were ipsilateral to the carotid artery stenosis. Among factors considered, only lower breath-holding index values in the middle cerebral artery ipsilateral to carotid artery stenosis were significantly associated with the risk of an event (hazard ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.38; P=.001, by multivariate analysis). Based on data from previously studied healthy subjects, the cutoff of the breath-holding index for distinguishing between impaired and normal cerebrovascular reactivity was determined to be 0.69. Using this cutoff, the annual ipsilateral ischemic event risk was 4.1% in patients with normal and 13.9% in those with impaired breath-holding index values. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a link between impaired cerebrovascular reactivity and the risk of ischemic events ipsilateral to severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.283.16.2122

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 587

Metadata

Authors
Silvestrini, M.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2000-04-26
Volume
283
Issue
16
Pages
2122
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2126491128
Cited by
587
References
26
FWCI
10.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impaired Cerebral Vasoreactivity and Risk of Stroke in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.283.16.2122
The paper
Silvestrini, M. (2000). Impaired Cerebral Vasoreactivity and Risk of Stroke in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.16.2122

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.