The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methylnaltrexone for Reversal of Constipation Due to Chronic Methadone Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
CONTEXT: Constipation is the most common chronic adverse effect of opioid pain medications in patients who require long-term opioid administration, such as patients with advanced cancer, but conventional measures for ameliorating constipation often are insufficient. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of methylnaltrexone, the first peripheral opioid receptor antagonist, in treating chronic methadone-induced constipation. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted between May 1997 and December 1998. SETTING: Clinical research center of a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two subjects (9 men and 13 women; mean [SD] age, 43.2 [5.5] years) enrolled in a methadone maintenance program and having methadone-induced constipation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Laxation response, oral-cecal transit time, and central opioid withdrawal symptoms were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The 11 subjects in the placebo group showed no laxation response, and all 11 subjects in the intervention group had laxation response after intravenous methylnaltrexone administration (P<.001). The oral-cecal transit times at baseline for subjects in the methylnaltrexone and placebo groups averaged 132.3 and 126.8 minutes, respectively. The average (SD) change in the methylnaltrexone-treated group was -77.7 (37.2) minutes, significantly greater than the average change in the placebo group (-1.4 [12.0] minutes; P<.001). No opioid withdrawal was observed in any subject, and no significant adverse effects were reported by the subjects during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that intravenous methylnaltrexone can induce laxation and reverse slowing of oral cecal-transit time in subjects taking high opioid dosages. Low-dosage methylnaltrexone may have clinical utility in managing opioid-induced constipation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Postoperative ileus: a preventable event
Holte, K., & Kehlet, H. (2000) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01595.x · Cited by 593
Incidence, Prevalence, and Management of Opioid Bowel Dysfunction
Pappagallo, M. (2001) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00782-6 · Cited by 531
Management of opioid side effects in cancer-related and chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review
McNicol, E., Horowicz-Mehler, N., Fisk, R. A., Bennett, K., Gialeli-Goudas, M., Chew, P. W., Lau, J., & Carr, D. (2003) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00556-x · Cited by 466
Opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract
Holzer, P. (2009) · Regulatory Peptides · doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2009.03.012 · Cited by 377
Selective Postoperative Inhibition of Gastrointestinal Opioid Receptors
Taguchi, A., Sharma, N., Saleem, R. M., Sessler, D. I., Carpenter, R. L., Seyedsadr, M., & Kurz, A. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010564 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, C.-S., Foss, J. F., O'Connor, M., Osinski, J., Karrison, T., Moss, J., & Roizen, M. F.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-01-19
- Volume
- 283
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2118983431
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methylnaltrexone for Reversal of Constipation Due to Chronic Methadone Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.283.3.367
- The paper
- Yuan, C.-S., Foss, J. F., O'Connor, M., Osinski, J., Karrison, T., Moss, J., & Roizen, M. F. (2000). Methylnaltrexone for Reversal of Constipation Due to Chronic Methadone Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.3.367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.