The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-term Satisfaction and Psychological and Social Function Following Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Abstract
CONTEXT: Prophylactic mastectomy is a preventive option for women who wish to reduce their risk of breast cancer. There has been concern about possible negative psychological sequelae following this procedure. However, few data are available regarding long-term satisfaction and psychological and social function following this procedure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients' long-term satisfaction and psychological and social function following prophylactic mastectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Descriptive study of all women known to be alive (n = 609) who had a family history of breast cancer and elected to undergo bilateral prophylactic mastectomy at a large, tertiary US health care clinic between 1960 and 1993, 94% (n = 572) of whom completed a study questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction with procedure and effects on psychological and social function, based on responses to the study-specific questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean time from prophylactic mastectomy to last follow-up was 14.5 years. Most women (70%) were satisfied with the procedure; 11% were neutral; and 19% were dissatisfied. Among the psychological and social variables, the most striking finding was that 74% reported a diminished level of emotional concern about developing breast cancer. The majority of women reported no change/favorable effects in levels of emotional stability (68%/23%), level of stress (58%/28%), self-esteem (69%/13%), sexual relationships (73%/4%), and feelings of femininity (67%/8%). Forty-eight percent reported no change in their level of satisfaction with body appearance; 16% reported favorable effects. However, 9%, 14%, 18%, 23%, 25%, and 36% reported negative effects in these 6 variables, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that positive outcomes following prophylactic mastectomy include decreased emotional concern about developing breast cancer and generally favorable psychological and social outcomes. These must be weighed against the irreversibility of the decision, potential problems with implants and reconstructive surgery, and occurrence of adverse psychological and social outcomes in some women. JAMA. 2000;284:319-324
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies have shown that the majority of women undergoing PM experience reduced cancer worry post-surgery [Frost 2000] [Bresser 2006] [Geiger 2006]”
From Support needs and acceptability of psychological and peer consultation: Attitudes of 108 women who had undergone or were considering prophylactic mastectomy (2008) · cites this paper as Frost 2000
In the citing paper
“Studies have shown that the majority of women following PM reported decreased (hereditary) cancer related distress while other psychosocial functioning does not appear to be significantly affected in a negative way [5,8-10].”
From Standard psychological consultations and follow up for women at increased risk of hereditary breast cancer considering prophylactic mastectomy (2009) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
A Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Quality-of-Life Measurements
Gill, T. M. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520080061045 · Cited by 2,209
Efficacy of Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer
Hartmann, L. C., Schaid, D. J., Woods, J. E., Crotty, T. P., Myers, J. L., Arnold, P. G., Petty, P. M., Sellers, T. A., Johnson, J. L., McDonnell, S. K., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901143400201 · Cited by 1,428
Self-citationBRCA1 Testing in Families With Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer
Lerman, C. E. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530480027036 · Cited by 826
What Do Global Self-Rated Health Items Measure?
KRAUSE, N. M., & Jay, G. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199409000-00004 · Cited by 716
State of science 1986: Quality of life and functional status as target variables for research
Spitzer, W. O. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90002-6 · Cited by 335
Predictors of and Satisfaction with Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Stefanek, M. E., Helzlsouer, K. J., Wilcox, P. M., & Houn, F. (1995) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1995.1066 · Cited by 177
Research in cancer pain. What we know and what we need to know
Cleeland, C. S. (1991) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19910201)67:3+ · Cited by 102
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-4520 · Cited by 94
Patient regrets after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy
Borgen, P., Hill, A., Tran, K. N., Zee, K. V., Massie, M., Payne, D., & Biggs, C. (1998) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1007/bf02303829 · Cited by 93
Prophylactic mastectomy--the price of fear.
Eisen, A., & Weber, B. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901143400209 · Cited by 69
Psychological Factors in the Choice of Treatment for Breast Cancer
Margolis, G. J., Goodman, R. L., RUBIN, A. M., & Pajac, T. F. (1989) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(89)72300-8 · Cited by 56
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: issues and concerns.
Stefanek, M. E. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 40
Acceptable Strategies for Dealing With Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Risk
Eisinger, F., Sobol, H., Julian‐Reynier, C., Chabal, F., Moatti, J., & Luquet, C. (1997) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/89.10.731 · Cited by 18
Mastectomy or breast conservation in the management of primary breast cancer: psychosocial factors.
Wolberg, W. H. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 13
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Breast Cancer after Prophylactic Bilateral Mastectomy in Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation
Meijers-Heijboer, H., van Geel, B., van Putten, W. L. J., Henzen-Logmans, S. C., Seynaeve, C., Menke-Pluymers, M. B. E., Bartels, C. C. M., Verhoog, L. C., van den Ouweland, A. M. W., Niermeijer, M. F., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200107193450301 · Cited by 973
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer
Lostumbo, L., Carbine, N. E., & Wallace, J. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002748.pub3 · Cited by 402
Nelson, H. D., Huffman, L. H., Fu, R. F., & Harris, E. L. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-143-5-200509060-00012 · Cited by 345
“Descriptive studies report improved concern about cancer after prophylactic surgeries (180–182) but also dissatisfaction with reconstruction (176), appearance (180), feelings of femininity (180), and sexual relationships (180), although several studies are inconclusive (183–186).”
BackgroundTung, N., Boughey, J. C., Pierce, L. J., Robson, M. E., Bedrosian, I., Dietz, J. R., Dragun, A. J., Balmañà, J., Hofstatter, E. W., Isaacs, C. J., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.20.00299 · Cited by 335
van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Lodder, L. N., Duivenvoorden, H. J., van Gool, A. R., Seynaeve, C., van der Meer, C. A., Klijn, J. G. M., van Geel, B. N., Burger, C. W., et al. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.10.100 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Frost, M. H.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Frost, Marlene H.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-07-19
- Volume
- 284
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 319
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2104836626
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (R01-80181)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Breast Implant and Reconstruction
- Keywords
- prophylactic mastectomy, bilateral mastectomy, breast cancer prevention, patient satisfaction, psychological outcomes, social functioning, self-esteem, body image, family history of breast cancer, long-term outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Mastectomy, Middle Aged, Social Behavior, Linear Models, Patient Satisfaction, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review