The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physical Abuse of Women Before, During, and After Pregnancy
Abstract
CONTEXT: Clinicians who care for new mothers and infants need information concerning postpartum physical abuse of women as a foundation on which to develop appropriate clinical screening and intervention procedures. However, no previous population-based studies have been conducted of postpartum physical abuse. OBJECTIVES: To examine patterns of physical abuse before, during, and after pregnancy in a representative statewide sample of North Carolina women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey of participants in the North Carolina Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (NC PRAMS). Of the 3542 women invited to participate in NC PRAMS between July 1, 1997, and December 31, 1998, 75% (n = 2648) responded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of physical abuse during the 12 months before pregnancy, during pregnancy, and after infant delivery; injuries and medical interventions resulting from postpartum abuse; and patterns of abuse over time in relation to sociodemographic characteristics and use of well-baby care. RESULTS: The prevalence of abuse before pregnancy was 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6%-8.2%) compared with 6.1% (95% CI, 4.8%-7.4%) during pregnancy and 3.2% (95% CI, 2.3%-4.1%) during a mean postpartum period of 3.6 months. Abuse during a previous period was strongly predictive of later abuse. Most women who were abused after pregnancy (77%) were injured, but only 23% received medical treatment for their injuries. Virtually all abused and nonabused women used well-baby care; private physicians were the most common source of care. The mean number of well-baby care visits did not differ significantly by maternal patterns of abuse. CONCLUSION: Since well-baby care use is similar for abused and nonabused mothers, pediatric practices may be important settings for screening women for violence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sexual and reproductive health: a matter of life and death.
Glasier, A., Gülmezoglu, A. M., Schmid, G. P., Moreno, C. G., & Van Look, P. F. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69478-6 · Cited by 700
Interventions for Violence Against Women: Scientific Review
Wathen, C. N., & MacMillan, H. L. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.5.589 · Cited by 513
Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
Alhusen, J. L., Ray, E., Sharps, P., & Bullock, L. (2015) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.4872 · Cited by 481
Physical Health Outcomes of Childhood Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review
Bair-Merritt, M. H., Blackstone, M., & Feudtner, C. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1473 · Cited by 278
Saltzman, L. E., Johnson, C. H., Gilbert, B. C., & Goodwin, M. M. (2003) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1022589501039 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, S. L.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-03-28
- Volume
- 285
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1581
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2002268508
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical Abuse of Women Before, During, and After Pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.285.12.1581
- The paper
- Martin, S. L. (2001). Physical Abuse of Women Before, During, and After Pregnancy. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.12.1581
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.