Cited by 278Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and Adoption

Physical Health Outcomes of Childhood Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review

Bair-Merritt, Megan H., Blackstone, Mercedes, Feudtner, Chris·2006·Pediatrics

Abstract

Background Children exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) are at increased risk for adverse mental and behavioral health sequelae, as has been documented by both systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Studies addressing the physical health impact of childhood IPV exposure, however, have not been summarized in a manner that might facilitate additional hypothesis-driven research and accelerate the development of targeted interventions. Methods To identify a comprehensive set of articles examining the association between childhood IPV exposure and physical health, we searched online bibliographic databases including Medline, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Sociological Abstracts using the keywords "domestic" or "intimate partner violence" and "infant," "child," or "pediatric." From >2000 articles retrieved in the initial search, we used online abstract and bibliographic information to identify 94 articles potentially meeting the inclusion criteria of studies that (1) examined a postnatal physical health outcome related to IPV exposure and (2) had a contemporaneous control group. Thorough review of these 94 published studies yielded 22 that met these inclusion criteria. The data then were abstracted independently by 2 of the authors, and differences were settled with the assistance of a third author. Results Childhood exposure to IPV increases the likelihood of risk-taking behaviors during adolescence and adulthood and is likely associated with underimmunization. Minimal data and stud…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2005-1473

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bair-Merritt, M. H., Blackstone, M., & Feudtner, C.
Affiliations
  • Pediatric Generalist Research Group, Division of General Pediatrics
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
e278-e290
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2148753207
Cited by
278
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
intimate partner violence, children's exposure, physical health, child health, adolescent risk behavior, underimmunization, breastfeeding, weight gain, health care utilization, domestic violence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Breast Feeding, Child, Child Welfare, Failure to Thrive, Female, Health Services, Health Status, Humans, Infant, Risk-Taking, Spouse Abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review