The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-term Outcome of Medical and Surgical Therapies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
CONTEXT: Severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a lifelong problem that can be complicated by peptic esophageal stricture and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for GERD. DESIGN AND SETTING: Follow-up study conducted from October 1997 through October 1999 of a prospective randomized trial of medical and surgical antireflux treatments in patients with complicated GERD. Mean (median) duration of follow-up was 10.6 years (7.3 years) for medical patients and 9.1 years (6.3 years) for surgical patients. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirty-nine (97%) of the original 247 study patients were found (79 were confirmed dead). Among the 160 survivors (157 men and 3 women; mean [SD] age, 67 [12] years), 129 (91 in the medical treatment group and 38 in the surgical treatment group) participated in the follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of antireflux medication, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Activity Index (GRACI) scores, grade of esophagitis, frequency of treatment of esophageal stricture, frequency of subsequent antireflux operations, 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36) scores, satisfaction with antireflux therapy, survival, and incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma, compared between the medical antireflux therapy group and the fundoplication surgery group. Information on cause of death was obtained from autopsy results, hospital records, and death certificates. RESULTS: Eighty-three (92%) of 90 medical patients and 23 (62%) of 37 surgical patients reported that they used antireflux medications regularly (P<.001). During a 1-week period after discontinuation of medication, mean (SD) GRACI symptom scores were significantly lower in the surgical treatment group (82.6 [17.5] vs 96.7 [21.4] in the medical treatment group; P =.003). However, no significant differences between the groups were found in grade of esophagitis, frequency of treatment of esophageal stricture and subsequent antireflux operations, SF-36 standardized physical and mental component scale scores, and overall satisfaction with antireflux therapy. Survival during a period of 140 months was decreased significantly in the surgical vs the medical treatment group (relative risk of death in the medical group, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.46; P =.047), largely because of excess deaths from heart disease. Patients with Barrett esophagus at baseline developed esophageal adenocarcinomas at an annual rate of 0.4%, whereas these cancers developed in patients without Barrett esophagus at an annual rate of only 0.07%. There was no significant difference between groups in incidence of esophageal cancer. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that antireflux surgery should not be advised with the expectation that patients with GERD will no longer need to take antisecretory medications or that the procedure will prevent esophageal cancer among those with GERD and Barrett esophagus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Katz, P. O., Gerson, L. B., & Vela, M. F. (2013) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2012.444 · Cited by 1,767
Updated Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
DeVault, K. R., & Castell, D. O. (2005) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41217.x · Cited by 1,130
Galmiche, J.-P., Hatlebakk, J., Attwood, S., Ell, C., Fiocca, R., Eklund, S., Långström, G., Lind, T., Lundell, L., & LOTUS Trial Collaborators, F. T. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.626 · Cited by 448
Sikkema, M., de Jonge, P. J. F., Steyerberg, E. W., & Kuipers, E. J. (2010) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.10.010 · Cited by 355
Barrett Esophagus and Risk of Esophageal Cancer: A Clinical Review
Spechler, S. J. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.226450 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Spechler, S. J., Lee, E., Ahnen, D., Goyal, R. K., Hirano, I., Ramirez, F., Raufman, J.-P., Sampliner, R., Schnell, T., Sontag, S., Vlahcevic, Z. R., Young, R., & Williford, W.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-05-09
- Volume
- 285
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2331
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2122973522
- Cited by
- 909
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 61.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term Outcome of Medical and Surgical Therapies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.285.18.2331
- The paper
- Spechler, S. J., Lee, E., Ahnen, D., Goyal, R. K., Hirano, I., Ramirez, F., Raufman, J.-P., Sampliner, R., Schnell, T., Sontag, S., Vlahcevic, Z. R., Young, R., & Williford, W. (2001). Long-term Outcome of Medical and Surgical Therapies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.18.2331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.