The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of a Whole-Blood Interferon γ Assay With Tuberculin Skin Testing for Detecting Latent <EMPH TYPE="ITAL">Mycobacterium tuberculosis</EMPH> Infection
Abstract
CONTEXT: Identifying persons with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is crucial to the goal of TB elimination. A whole-blood interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) assay, the QuantiFERON-TB test, is a promising in vitro diagnostic test for LTBI that has potential advantages over the tuberculin skin test (TST). OBJECTIVES: To compare the IFN-gamma assay with the TST and to identify factors associated with discordance between the tests. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective comparison study conducted at 5 university-affiliated sites in the United States between March 1, 1998 and June 30, 1999. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1226 adults (mean age, 39 years) with varying risks of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection or documented or suspected active TB, all of whom underwent both the IFN-gamma assay and the TST. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Level of agreement between the IFN-gamma assay and the TST. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety participants (31.8%) had a positive TST result and 349 (28.5%) had a positive IFN-gamma assay result. Overall agreement between the IFN-gamma assay and the TST was 83.1% (kappa = 0.60). Multivariate analysis revealed that the odds of having a positive TST result but negative IFN-gamma assay result were 7 times higher for BCG-vaccinated persons compared with unvaccinated persons. The IFN-gamma assay provided evidence that among unvaccinated persons with a positive TST result but negative IFN-gamma assay result, 21.2% were responding to mycobacteria other than M tuberculosis. CONCLUSIONS: For all study participants, as well as for those being screened for LTBI, the IFN-gamma assay was comparable with the TST in its ability to detect LTBI, was less affected by BCG vaccination, discriminated responses due to nontuberculous mycobacteria, and avoided variability and subjectivity associated with placing and reading the TST.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
von Reyn, C. F., Williams, D. E., Horsburgh, Jr., Jaeger, A. S., Marsh, B. J., Haslov, K., & Magnusson, M. (1998) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/514225 · Cited by 62
Cited by
Interferon-γ assays in the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic review
Pai, M., Riley, L. W., & Colford, J. M. (2004) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(04)01206-x · Cited by 913
Immune Control of Tuberculosis by IFN-γ-Inducible LRG-47
MacMicking, J. D., Taylor, G. A., & McKinney, J. D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088063 · Cited by 685
Frieden, T. R., Sterling, T. R., Munsiff, S. S., Watt, C. J., & Dye, C. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14333-4 · Cited by 689
Changing approaches to the diagnosis of tuberculosis
SCHLUGER, N. W. (2001) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.164.11.2008100 · Cited by 60
Dong, Q., Wang, M., Wang, Z., Shi, J., Xie, J., Li, X., Liu, C., Chen, Y., & Guo, S. (2025) · Infection and Drug Resistance · doi:10.2147/idr.s515196 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazurek, G. H.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-10-10
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1740
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2154625247
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of a Whole-Blood Interferon γ Assay With Tuberculin Skin Testing for Detecting Latent <EMPH TYPE="ITAL">Mycobacterium tuberculosis</EMPH> Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.286.14.1740
- The paper
- Mazurek, G. H. (2001). Comparison of a Whole-Blood Interferon γ Assay With Tuberculin Skin Testing for Detecting Latent <EMPH TYPE="ITAL">Mycobacterium tuberculosis</EMPH> Infection. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.14.1740
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.