The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potential Role of Pharmacogenomics in Reducing Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review
Abstract
CONTEXT: Adverse drug reactions are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Although many adverse drug reactions are considered nonpreventable, recent developments suggest these reactions may be avoided through individualization of drug therapies based on genetic information, an application known as pharmacogenomics. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential role of pharmacogenomics in reducing the incidence of adverse drug reactions. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE English-language only searches for adverse drug reaction studies published between January 1995 and June 2000 and review articles of variant alleles of drug-metabolizing enzymes published between January 1997 and August 2000. We also used online resources, texts, and expert opinion. STUDY SELECTION: Detailed inclusion criteria were used to select studies. We included 18 of 333 adverse drug reaction studies and 22 of 61 variant allele review articles. DATA EXTRACTION: All the investigators reviewed and coded articles using standardized abstracting forms. DATA SYNTHESIS: We identified 27 drugs frequently cited in adverse drug reaction studies. Among these drugs, 59% are metabolized by at least 1 enzyme with a variant allele known to cause poor metabolism. Conversely, only 7% to 22% of randomly selected drugs are known to be metabolized by enzymes with this genetic variability (range, P =.006-P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that drug therapy based on individuals' genetic makeups may result in a clinically important reduction in adverse outcomes. Our findings serve as a foundation for further research on how pharmacogenomics can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions and on the resulting clinical, societal, and economic implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events: Implications for Prevention
Bates, D. W. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530010043033 · Cited by 2,127
Cited by
Lee, W. M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra021844 · Cited by 1,594
(2007) · PubMed · Cited by 953
Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation
Rothwell, P. M. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)17709-5 · Cited by 942
Safety of Statins: Focus on Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interactions
Bellosta, S., Paoletti, R., & Corsini, A. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000131519.15067.1f · Cited by 578
Rasmussen (2002) · Pharmacogenetics · doi:10.1097/00008571-200208000-00008 · Cited by 241
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, K. A., Veenstra, D. L., Oren, E., Lee, J. K., & Sadee, W.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-11-14
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2270
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1996323553
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential Role of Pharmacogenomics in Reducing Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.286.18.2270
- The paper
- Phillips, K. A., Veenstra, D. L., Oren, E., Lee, J. K., & Sadee, W. (2001). Potential Role of Pharmacogenomics in Reducing Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.18.2270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.